Answer:
- the way its set up its kind of confusing ↑
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: The given logical equivalence is proved below.
Step-by-step explanation: We are given to use truth tables to show the following logical equivalence :
P ⇔ Q ≡ (∼P ∨ Q)∧(∼Q ∨ P)
We know that
two compound propositions are said to be logically equivalent if they have same corresponding truth values in the truth table.
The truth table is as follows :
P Q ∼P ∼Q P⇔ Q ∼P ∨ Q ∼Q ∨ P (∼P ∨ Q)∧(∼Q ∨ P)
T T F F T T T T
T F F T F F T F
F T T F F T F F
F F T T T T T T
Since the corresponding truth vales for P ⇔ Q and (∼P ∨ Q)∧(∼Q ∨ P) are same, so the given propositions are logically equivalent.
Thus, P ⇔ Q ≡ (∼P ∨ Q)∧(∼Q ∨ P).
If I put this into an equation it would look like 2x+2= 66. 66-2= 64. You do this because to get x you have to reverse the equation, but you have to do the number not connected to x first. Then 2x= 64. So you divide 64 by 2 which is 32. So Jordan is 32 years old. Hope this helped!
0.4 is the answer, 3/5= 0.6
