Answer:
The answer is B. Ethan has more experience than Karen.
Explanation:
Now, lets take each Answer option separately and see why only B is correct.
Option A is no longer legally accepted or ethical. Perhaps during the era of segregation back in 1960s' this option could have been acceptable. But today it is illegal and is considered as a violation of basic human rights.
Option C is not correct as well because although people with special needs and physical requirements are entitled to receive certain special treatments, paying them more solely based on their disability is not considered suitable nor ethical.
Option D is unacceptable. No one can assume that men have more stamina than women. There are competent, strong and qualified women who can do their jobs much better than men. So we cannot accept this as an answer.
Option E is incorrect as well. Although a person could be an immigrant, once that person has lawfully taken the citizenship of a country, that "immigrant" is considered as a "citizen" of that country (this is not applicable for illegal immigrants!).
However, we can take option B as the answer. This is because when comparing a new employee with a more experienced employee, we can't see any problem in paying the experienced employee more.
Answer:
The correct option is A, abnormal price change at the announcement
Explanation:
Abnormal price increase before the announcement would only be the case if the there was insider dealing, that is there exists information leakage.
An abnormal price decrease cannot be the case, the market prices a share based on its earnings' strength, in other words a stock with high dividends prospect is priced high.
Option D is wrong there would a price change stemming from the announcement made about large cash dividends payout
If a consumer experiences a loss, he or she can file a payout with an insurance company.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In addition to fully alternate the loss of a consumer, the insurance companies save them from traumatic fall by payouts. This is provided by the policyholder, once the consumer claims for it under valid reasons and proof.
If a consumer experiences a loss, he or she can file a payout with an insurance company.
This payouts is claimed when the consumer wishes to refund or repair their property and in the case of life loss, the consumers have to show the certificate of the deceased person to claim the payout.
Answer:
11%
Explanation:
Average cost of automobiles in 2013 = $15,500
Average cost of automobiles now = $17,205
Change in average cost = $17,205 - $15,500
= $1,705
Rate of increase in cost is the ratio between the increase and the average cost before the increase.
Rate of increase = ($1,705/$15,500) × 100%
= 11%
The rate of increase for these automobiles between the two time periods is 11%.
Answer:
Following are the response to the given question:
Explanation:
Investing price falls as companies become increasingly negative about investment. Lowering prices for capital will shift the expenditure curve. When total expenditures drop, the IS curve moves to the left. It will lead to a decline in productivity and interest rates in the context of the IS-LM model. Next, consider how the current account will operate (which is the trade balance of the nation). This is what we're seeing as just a paradigm for just a real balance of currency fluctuations. The S-I line swings from S-I1 to S-I2 as expenditures decline from I1 to I2. The currency rate is down and private consumption has risen. Its idea is that even the currency is little valuable as exchange rates decline. Exports to the rest of the world are thus cheaper. Foreign exchange is appreciated as well as the domestic market needs costlier goods. Exports will therefore decrease. Export growth and import reductions are going to improve the trade balance. It will boost the bank account.
