Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
1.
Direct Material Price Variance = Actual material cost - Actual Quantity × Standard Price
For Silver
= $13848 - 577 × 23
= $577 (U)
For Crystal
= $2926 - 7700 × 0.40
= $154 (F)
Direct Material Quantity Variance = (Actual Quantity - Standard Quantity) × Standard Price
For Silver
= (577 - 1530 × 0.40) × 23
= $805 (F)
For Crystal
= (7700 - 1530 × 5) × 0.40
= $20 (U)
2.
Direct Labor Rate Variance = Actual Cost - Actual Hours × Standard Rate
= $36915 - 3210 × 12
= $1605 (F)
And,
Direct Labor efficiency Variance = (Actual hours - Standard hours) × Standard Rate
= (3210 - 1530 × 2) × 12
= $1800 (U)
Answer:
Option b. a net operating loss occurs.
Explanation:
contribution margin is simply known to be that portion of sales revenue that is yet to be consumed by variable costs and so is an addition to covering the fixed costs. The higher the contribution margin ratio, the more smaller or fewer the units that will need to be manufactured to become profitable. In short, it is sales revenue minus fixed expenses.
Answer:
$36
Explanation:
The contribution margin per unit is calculated by subtracting the variable cost per unit from the selling price.
Selling price is $60
Contribution margin per unit?
The total sales in dollar value are $15,000, The sales in units equal to
=$15,000 /60
=250 units
Total variable costs will include variable manufacturing cost plus variable selling and administrative costs
=$4000 + $2000
=$6000
variable cost per unit will be the total variable cost divide by units produced
=$6000/250
=$24
Contribution margin per unit = $60- $24
=$36
Answer:
The answer id: D) Yes, because Stanford and DiggyWerx each receive a benefit and incur a detriment.
Explanation:
Both Stanford and DiggyWerx both receive a benefit from this contract; Stanford gets $5,500 and DiggyWerx gets accounting services for six months.
They both also incurred detriment since; Stanford promised to perform his accounting duties and DiggyWerx promised to pay him money.
Both parties incurred detriment (promised to do something) and something of value is exchanged benefiting both parties, so consideration exists and therefore the control is enforceable.
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
