Answer:
6.11%
Explanation:
For computing the variance, first we have to determine the expected return which is shown below:
= (Expected return of the boom × weightage of boom) + (expected return of the normal economy × weightage of normal economy) + (expected return of the recession × weightage of recession)
= (12% × 5%) + (10% × 85%) + (2% × 10%)
= 0.6% + 8.5% + 0.2%
= 9.30%
Now the variance would equal to the
= Weightage × (Return - Expected Return) ^2
For boom:
= 5% × (12% - 9.3%) ^2
= 0.3645
For normal economy:
= 85% × (10% - 9.3%) ^2
= 0.4165
For recession:
= 10% × (2% - 9.3%) ^2
= 5.329
So, the total variance would be
= 0.3645 + 0.4165 + 5.329
= 6.11%
Answer:
lack of anonymity
Explanation:
According to my research on whistle-blowing systems within organizations, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the major issue that the program seems to have is a lack of anonymity. All whistle-blower systems are designed to be completely anonymous so that anyone who uses the system to do the right thing and report people who are breaking the law or rules are not mentioned and face backlash from co-workers. Apparently, the system that Company X is either not anonymous or is not adhering to the anonymity policy.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer: The Ricardian equivalence theorem states that
: <u>"A. an increase in the government budget deficit has no effect on aggregate demand."</u>
Explanation: Ricardian Equivalence establishes that when the government increases the expenses financed with debt to try to stimulate the demand, this increase of the expenses does not produce any change in the demand.
This happens because the increases in the public deficit will be higher taxes in the future. Therefore, taxpayers reduce their consumption and increase their savings in order to offset the cost that will be the future tax increase.
Answer:
C. Free cash flow is utilized to fund a diversification strategy and having additional funds could support future investments.
The exposure that should be considered is acute.
Given that,
- Howard has the chemical burn into his arm.
- Due to this, there is a small burn mark that goes after some weeks but at the same time, he does not have any other symptoms.
- Because of the burning, it is an acute expsoure.
Therefore we can conclude that the exposure that should be considered is acute.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/9223008
