Step-by-step explanation:
step 1. P(0, 1) -> P'(0, -1)
step 2. Q(0, 0) -> Q'(0, 0)
step 3. R(-2, 0) -> R'(2, 0)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a hemisphere is half a sphere.
And if the formula for the volume of a sphere is:
we must calculate the volume of the sphere and in the end divide by two to find the volume of the hemisphere.
Since the radius is:
substituting this into the formula for volume:
this is the volume of the total sphere, thus the volume of a hemisphere is:
rounding to the nearest tenth:
Answer:
The first answer: 390m The second answer: x = 7; m<1 = 17; m<2 = 73
Step-by-step explanation:
First problem:
It's asking for the distance he walks by walking around a rectangular box which is the perimeter.
Two of the sides will have length 115m and two will have length 80m. So this perimeter is 115 + 115 + 80 + 80 = 390m.
Second problem:
Complementary angles add to 90 degrees. So m<1 and m<2 added together will equal 90
-4x +45 + 7x + 24 = 90
3x + 69 = 90
3x = 21
x= 7.
Plug back x into both m<1 and m<2 to find the measure of the angles.
m<1 = -4(7) + 45 = 45-28 = 17
m<2 = 7(7) + 24 = 49 + 24 = 73
D. <em>10.48</em>
<em>correct Answer<3</em>
<em />
<em />
<em />
<em />
<h2><em>Please Mark Brainliest Ty!</em></h2>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
With regards to the factor 'walking device used', the ANOVA conducted on the cadence data revealed a main effect of walking device, and also with the results of the experiment giving rise to a p - value less than 0.05, we can reject the null hypothesis which says, there is no effect of the walking device factor.
We can thus conclude that there is not enough statistics evidence to prove that there is no interaction between the two factors or that there is no effect of the walking device given the cadence data.
