Can someone explain how to due this
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
The system of linear equations has infinitely many solutions
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's modified the equations and find the answer.
Using the first equation:
we can multiply by 2 in both sides, obtaining:
which can by simplified as:
which is equal to:
Considering the second equation:
Taking into account that from the first equation we know that: , we can express the second equation as:
, which can be simplified as:
Because (-8) is being divided by (2+k), then (2+k) can't be equal to 0, so:
if
This means that k can be any number different than -2, and for each of these solutions, there is a different solution for y, allowing also, different solutions for x.
For example, if k=0 then
which give us y=-4, and, because:
if y=-4 then
Now let's try with k=-1, then:
which give us y=-8, and, because:
if y=-8 then
.
Then, the system of linear equations has infinitely many solutions
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Newton's third law states that for every force, there is an equal and opposite reaction. For example, if you collide two objects together, all of the forces in the system would cancel out because energy conserved with the opposite and equal reactions.
Between two examples (2 identical billiard balls and 2 different toy cars), the easiest way to demonstrate Newton's third law is using the 2 balls, since they are identical in shape and mass. When pushing the two balls in the exact same way with the SAME force, the net force of the equation is basically 0;
Therefore, A is correct.
If you pushed a toy car and a toy truck towards each other using the same force, the outcome would not be completely opposite since F = ma and masses are different. Instead, to have a completely opposite and equal reaction, the resulting direction and forces are different. The lighter car would accelerate more in the opposite direction to compensate for the lighter mass. Therefore, B is wrong because even though they are different sizes, newton's third law still happens in the resulting direction and forces, but are simply harder to explain due to so many differing factors.
C is wrong, because diameter of two objects has no correlation to the net force equations. Even if two objects have the same diameter, they could have different masses, shapes, elasticity, etc.
D is wrong, because it goes against Newton's 3rd law. Newton's 3rd law is a LAW. Meaning, it is ALWAYS true (unless in some distant future it's disproven). In any and every collision, energy is conserved in some way that net forces equal 0; either in friction, gravitational force, or resulting force, the net force is always 0.