Answer:
The differing views on child rearing expressed by Locke and Rousseau highlight the debate on education through direct instruction versus self-discovery.
Explanation:
Locke defended the idea that the child is like a tabula rasa - a blank slate. That means the child learns whatever he/she is taught by means of direct instruction. On the other hand, Rousseau defended the idea that a child would learn through self-discovery, through spontaneous interactions with the world and others. To Rousseau, children should be given as much freedom to explore as possible.
Answer:
They were similar politically and in the fact that they both had royal governors and slaves (depends on exactly what time in history). Socially and economically they had some differences.
Explanation:
Answer:
Ben Franklin is saying, join all the colonies together and if they don't they would die if they are by them self. If you see all the snake's parts, they are separated and each one stands for a colony.
This question is confusing and hard to comprehend
Answer:
Critics of the <u>social congnitive </u> personality theory is very sensitive to an individual's interactions with particular situations, but that it gives too little attention to the person's enduring traits.
Explanation:
Social congnitive theory focusses on behavioral modification, for this they study the congnitive and social factors influencing behaviors. Since the objective is to modify conducts, they care to determine how to influence it in order for it to have a change.
The theory says, personality is determined but cognitive processes by which a person decides and acts upon but mostly refering it to social references. This way the arguments says, the theory lacks on the enduring traits of personality, the aspects by which modifications cannot be easily made.
