Answer:
The correct answer is d) South Africa continued its enforcement of a system of racial discrimination.
Explanation:
For many years South Africa lived under the racial segregation imposed by the apartheid system, which divided its citizens by race, in these years the power was of the white people and the black people were separated in different places, they would not have the same privilege as white-skinned people.
All these acts were rejected by different nations after the organization of the United Nations made sanctions trying to exert an effect on the rulers and seeing that they had no value for them, the different countries against the segregation that was living in its vast majority South African population, they decided to carry out economic sanctions towards the country with the objective that this behavior cease.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION
For
1. Animals have always been used for experiments that are considered dangerous for humans, e.g lab rats.
This is necessary as some procedures are considered too dangerous for a human to undergo, and therefore, an animal is used to test the process.
2. Animals cannot talk, therefore, have no rights.
Animals, though living, do not have and enjoy the same rights that humans do according to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This makes it possible to subject them to experiments because no rights are being infringed upon.
Against
1. It is unethical and inhumane to use animals for experiments
Animals have feelings and as such should not be used for unsafe experiments. The practise is inhuman and unethical as it is done without the consent of the animal.
2. Animals are living things and so they have rights.
Animals are living and such should be considered to have rights just as humans do and it would be wrong for any scientist to get any animal of his choice to perform experiments.
Answer:
The <u>CRM (Composite Risk Management)</u> is the primary decision making process for identifying hazards and controlling risks across the full spectrum of military missions, functions, operations, and activities.
Explanation:
Composite Risk Management (CRM) is a decision-making process used by the military to mitigate certaing risks and hazards related to personnel's injuries, damage of equipment or mission effectiveness.
To be effective, the CRM process must include some basic steps, such as: identifying hazards to the force, assessing hazards to evaluate risks, developing controls, implementing those new controls, supervising and evaluating the full process.