Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
Answer:
The Crusades were between <u>Muslims and Christians</u>
Trade routes linked Western Europe with SE Asia and <u>North Africa</u>
The correct answer is conservation of number
According to Piaget's theory, when the child has no notion of conservation, that is, when he does not believe that there may be different configurations for the same object, he is going through the preoperative period or early childhood, which occurs from 2 (two) at 7 (seven) years.
When a team has meaningful purpose that all members of a team aspire to, it is called vision. Hope this helps!
