Question options:
A. Across subjects multiple-baseline design
B. Across situations multiple-baseline design
C. Across behaviors multiple-baseline design
D. Across subjects ABA design
Answer:
A. Across subjects multiple-baseline design
Explanation:
In the multiple-baseline design, behavior is measured across either multiple individuals, behaviors, or settings.
For the multiple-baseline-across-subjects design, the same behavior is observed and studied for multiple individuals as is lllustrated above.
By gathering data from many or more than one subject or instances inferences can be more informed and be made about the likeliness that the measured trait generalizes to a greater population.
This argument is based on <span>The linguistic relativity hypothesis
According to </span><span>The linguistic relativity hypothesis, the language that people use in our day to day life will heavily influence the view/cognition of the speaker.
For example, if a person tend to use high-energy language, that person will be more likely to feel optimistic in facing the problem in front of him/her</span>
Answer:
parol evidence
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the admission of Brogan's testimony is most likely governed by the parol evidence rule. This rule created to prevent a party from introducing evidence before the agreement was made final in order to change the existing contract. Which is what Brogan is doing in this scenario by trying to release evidence about his age before the finalization of the contract.
Answer:
The Continental Army defeated the British to end the war in the South by tiring them out which forced them to retreat in Yorktown, where they were defeated.
Explanation:
Answer:
It could affect the way we face certain problems. It can also affect the way we perceive different problems.
Explanation:
