1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anit [1.1K]
3 years ago
8

Solve the following equation for x using the natural logarithm

Mathematics
1 answer:
labwork [276]3 years ago
5 0
Use log rule
log(ab) = log a + log b

Take log of both sides:
ln 4 + ln 4^x = ln 10 + ln e^{-x}

Use log rule
log(a^n) = n*log(a)

ln 4 + xln 4 = ln 10 -xln e \\  \\ ln 4 + xln 4 = ln 10 -x \\  \\ x ln 4+x = ln 10 - ln 4 \\  \\ x(ln 4 +1) = ln 10 -ln 4 \\  \\ x = \frac{ln 10 - ln 4}{ln 4 +1}
You might be interested in
What are the solutions (intersections) for –2| x– 16| = 6 ?
sergeinik [125]

Answer:

No solutions

Step-by-step explanation:

First, you need to divide both sides of this equation by -2, making the equation |x-16|=-3. At this point you should know there cannot be any solutions to the equation because absolute value cannot be negative.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How to solve for y if  the equation is y=5/2x + 5 if x is zero
Karolina [17]
y=\dfrac{5}{2}\cdot0+5\\
y=0+5\\
y=5
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
125+[-125]=? PLEASE HELP?!
elena55 [62]
The answer to this question is 0.

Hope this helps :)
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help me, i want now
VARVARA [1.3K]

The value of angle C in the triangle is 50°.

<h3>How to calculate the triangle?</h3>

From the information given, the angle A = 60° while B is given as 70° and we are told to calculate the value of C.

It should be noted that the sum of angles on a triangle is 180°. Therefore, the value of C will be:

= 180° - (60° + 70°)

= 180° - 130°

= 50°

Learn more about triangles on:

brainly.com/question/1058720

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many permutations in the word calculus
    15·1 answer
  • Betty has 741 coins in her piggy bank, worth a total of 10,725 cents. The piggy bank only contains quarters and dimes. How many
    7·1 answer
  • In a presentation about measuring mass, one of your classmates states, "Two objects of the same size will always have the same m
    12·2 answers
  • Is the likelihood of the occurrence of an event and are numbers
    6·1 answer
  • The unlabeled graph shows the relationship two customary units of measure. Identify a pair of units that can be represented by t
    6·1 answer
  • Determine the solution to this system of equations. You may refer to the graph on the previous problem. Write the answer as an o
    5·2 answers
  • Kimberly has $80. She wants to purchase a school bag for $16 and as many pairs of shoes as she can. Each pair of shoes is $8. Wr
    12·1 answer
  • -3 + 12x^2 + 3x - 5x^2 + 2x + 6 =
    13·2 answers
  • Ned had 76 boxes. together the boxes weighed 723 kilograms. About how much did each box weigh
    13·1 answer
  • (help) what is 10 1/2 ÷ 9 2/6 = ?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!