At the level of 0.05% significance we can not reject the psychologist's claim. His claim is supported.
Explanation:
When a researcher undertakes a project to do research firstly he takes some random samples. Sample is definite a small group of numbers assume to represent the whole population. Suppose a researcher wants to do research on married couples to find the trend of divorce among them. For that reason he will randomly choose some of the couples and will draw conclusions that inter personal communication reduce the chances of divorce.
Now to establish this experiment as a fact he needs to go through a test of level of significance. Where he will get the result that his statement is established or rejected.
Answer:
you want us to wright you a essay
Answer:
im pretty sure its increased immunity
Explanation:
meditation doesnt increase your immunity to things
(sorry if its wrong)
Of the different categories of children found in most classrooms, researchers have come to have the best understanding of the "popular" and "rejected" child.
Popular children get numerous positive and few negative selections. They are all around preferred by others and they are agreeable, amiable, inviting, and touchy to others. Where rejected children get numerous negative and couple of positive designations. They are effectively hated. They display less positive social aptitudes and qualities than do kids in alternate gatherings, and they indicate weaker scholarly and scholarly capacities.
