Answer:
The correct answer is "$28.03".
Explanation:
The given values are:
Good purchase,
= $25
Dividend,
= $1.40
Annually earning,
= 5%
Beta coefficient,
= 1.3
Treasury bills,
= 1.4%
Now,
= 
= 
= 
(%)
hence,
The fair value will be:
= 
= 
Absolutely, the proposal including its brokerage must be adopted because as fair market value was almost $25.
Answer:
A. $60
Explanation:
Recall that, consumer's surplus refers to the price that a consumer is willing to pay less the amount he or she actually pays.
Thus
Consumer surplus = maximum price willing to pay - actual market price.
Given that
Market price = $40
Vonda is willing to pay = $90
Aleiyah is willing to pay = $50
Hence.
Vonda consumer surplus = 90 - 40
= $50
Aleiyah consumer surplus = 50 - 40
= $10.
Total consumer surplus = 50 + 10
= $60.
Answer:
Option A is the correct approach.
Explanation:
- This is indeed a connection to compulsory tax and government expense stabilizers which weren't at the discretion including its government. Throughout the event of a recession, expenses are cut, rising discretionary income to something like the extent that the economic depression is pacified.
- Unemployment insurance, as well as other social programs, are consequently expanded without the clear intervention of the government
The other options offered are also not relevant to the scenario presented. So, the solution above is the right one.
Answer:
B. are primarily designed to protect bondholders
Explanation:
Protective covenants are designed primarily to protect bondholders from future actions of bond issuer. They are also part of a loan agreement that limits certain actions a company may take during the course of the loan to protect the person who lend the money interests. They provide extra protection for the investors. Creditors use it to protect their interests by restricting certain activities of the issuer that could endanger the creditor's interest.
Answer:
C) A 25% increase in sales resulting in a 30% increase in net operating income.
