<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the best response is "destructive" since many Natives were moves off their land. </span>
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
According to the passage, the land reforms developed in Guatemala might have encouraged similar reforms and social movements in other countries of Central America.
As per the author, this reforms which had a socialist connotation, might have been really dangerous for the interests of the upper class members like bussinessmen and landowners. Also, the reforms might have had a negative over the interests of multinational companies.
Answer: According to Erasmus, it is not biblical to execute heretics.
Explanation: Erasmus was a Christian humanist that lived during the Renaissance period.<u> He promoted religious toleration as he was against the execution of heretics</u>. Instead of being in favour of the killing of heretics, <u>Erasmus believed in conversion, even though he also supported free will</u>. In that way, throughout his work, he aimed at putting an end to the execution of heretics for considering it anti-biblical.
Answer:
B. Civil rights leaders were arrested.
Explanation:
The sit-in was a civil rights protest against segregation in the South by African American students. The sit-ins demonstrated as a nonviolent protest of the civil rights movement. The sin-in resulted in the arrest of leaders in the South, but later they were released. The civil rights movement helped African Americans to break the pattern of segregation.
