Let
x = minutes used for jogging
y = minutes used for handball
z = minutes used for cycling
Th total time spent is 1 hour (60 minutes), therefore
x + y + z = 60
Because Mike jogs as long as he cycles, therefore
x = z
Therefore
2x + y = 60
or
y = 60 - 2x (1)
Jogging consumes 10 calories/min, handball consumes 9 calories/min and cycling consumes 12 calories/min.
The calories consumed in 60 minutes is 580, therefore
10 x + 9y + 12z = 580
Because x = z,
22x + 9y = 580 (2)
Substitute (1) into (2).
22x + 9(60 - 2x) = 580
22x + 540 - 18x = 580
4x = 40
x = 10
y = 60 - 2x = 40
z = x = 10
Answer:
10 minutes of jogging
40 minutes of handball
10 minutes of cycling.
Answer:
d. This cannot be determined from the given information
Explanation:
To find the average revenue of 200 units it is necessary to know the total units. However, the function of the marginal revenue is not given. It is impossible to infer the marginal revenue (price) of other units (of output) only from knowing the marginal revenue of the 100th unit.
RULE 1.7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST: CURRENT CLIENTS
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if:
(1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or
(2) the representation of one or more clients may be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person, or by a personal interest of the lawyer.
(b) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a), a lawyer may represent a client if:
(1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client;
(2) the representation is not prohibited by law;
(3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and
(4) each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.
Answer and Explanation:
The economics of scope refers to the total cost production cost i.e to be averaged for the various type of goods
While on the other hand, the economics of scale refers to the benefit of the cost than occurs when there is a higher production level at a time
Based on this, the classification is as follows
1, Economics of scale as the output rises that declines the LAC so automatically it goes downward
2. economics of scope
