1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Snowcat [4.5K]
3 years ago
12

ASAP!!!!!!! Communist leaders came to power without the backing of the Soviet Union in:

History
1 answer:
anygoal [31]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D. Hungary

Explanation:

The Revolutions of 1989 formed part of a revolutionary wave in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The Soviet Union dissolved in December 1991, resulting in eleven new. During the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, a spontaneous nationwide. Hardline communist rulers like East Germany Erich Honecker, Bulgaria's Todor.

You might be interested in
What were the roots of martin luther king jr's beliefs in nonviolent resistance?
stiv31 [10]
Martin Luther King Jr. was a Christian, and his strong belief about his religious preference paved the way for him to lead a non-violent resistance during the Civil Rights movement. He was the president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference in 1957 and paved the way for combating segregation in Albany, Georgia. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who won the Opium War between China and Great Britain?
ad-work [718]
Great Britain won the Opium War against China.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following contributed to the Great Depression? A. The end of the Dust Bowl B. The start of World War II C. An incre
DIA [1.3K]

Answer:

Hi, there!

Which of the following contributed to the Great Depression?

C. An increase in poverty Is the correct Answer!

xXxAnimexXx

Have a great day!

5 0
3 years ago
What were andrew johnson policies concerning the rights of African Americans?
Lelu [443]

for the most part, historians view Andrew Johnson as the worst possible person to have served as President at the end of the American Civil War. Because of his gross incompetence in federal office and his incredible miscalculation of the extent of public support for his policies, Johnson is judged as a great failure in making a satisfying and just peace. He is viewed to have been a rigid, dictatorial racist who was unable to compromise or to accept a political reality at odds with his own ideas. Instead of forging a compromise between Radical Republicans and moderates, his actions united the opposition against him. His bullheaded opposition to the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Fourteenth Amendment eliminated all hope of using presidential authority to affect further compromises favorable to his position. In the end, Johnson did more to extend the period of national strife than he did to heal the wounds of war.

Most importantly, Johnson's strong commitment to obstructing political and civil rights for blacks is principally responsible for the failure of Reconstruction to solve the race problem in the South and perhaps in America as well. Johnson's decision to support the return of the prewar social and economic system—except for slavery—cut short any hope of a redistribution of land to the freed people or a more far-reaching reform program in the South.

Historians naturally wonder what might have happened had Lincoln, a genius at political compromise and perhaps the most effective leader to ever serve as President, lived. Would African Americans have obtained more effective guarantees of their civil rights? Would Lincoln have better completed what one historian calls the "unfinished revolution" in racial justice and equality begun by the Civil War? Almost all historians believe that the outcome would have been far different under Lincoln's leadership.

Among historians, supporters of Johnson are few in recent years. However, from the 1870s to around the time of World War II, Johnson enjoyed high regard as a strong-willed President who took the courageous high ground in challenging Congress's unconstitutional usurpation of presidential authority. In this view, much out of vogue today, Johnson is seen to have been motivated by a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution and by a firm belief in the separation of powers. This perspective reflected a generation of historians who were critical of Republican policy and skeptical of the viability of racial equality as a national policy. Even here, however, apologists for Johnson acknowledge his inability to effectively deal with congressional challenges due to his personal limitations as a leader.

7 0
3 years ago
What happened in the 1680s that created conflict between Britain and the American colonies?
Irina18 [472]

Answer:

D. King James II gave his colonial governors more power.

Explanation:

History

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the policies of thatcherism
    5·1 answer
  • What does Shogun mean
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following actions has NO impact on your credit score?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did Martin Luther’s account of his break with the church change between 1517 and 1535
    12·1 answer
  • Help please :)<br><br> -What are the rules for citizenship by birth?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is an example of a historical argument?
    12·2 answers
  • Which delegate was called the "Father of the Constitution"?
    12·1 answer
  • Diseases from Europe had a devastating effect on
    5·1 answer
  • Chiến thắng vạn tường diễn ra năm nào
    11·1 answer
  • Thomas Jefferson statement "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" comes from a direct reference from writings of
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!