Jesus wept over Jerusalem and grieved over mankind's hard hearts. Jesus knew that most would reject Him, just as had been prophesied.
They both used Decentralized government
They both distribute their governmental power into several locations, to make sure that they reach each corner of the countries while still maintaining control from the central government
These smaller Authorities can enforce their own decision making, but they still have to follow the guidelines from the central government
Answer:
The events of the 1980s and 1990s helped to maintain world peace were the Persian Gulf war, the Iran-Iraq war, Lebanon war, the bombing of Libya, and the last stage of the cold war.
Explanation:
These events were the major events that allowed world peace to be kept in between the 1980s and the 1990s, however, they did it because they threatened it. It is very complicated, but the reasons are that these weren't high scalation conflicts, they were local conflicts and didn't clash the major party's that could trigger a world conflict directly. They only participated indirectly, by providing support to the participating party's.
The rate of 40 percent will be used for the highest earners in Country X pay in taxes.
<h3>What is a progressive taxation?</h3>
This method of taxation involves use of higher tax rates for those who earns higher income or more wealth,
Hence, the rate of 40 percent will be used for the highest earners in Country X pay in taxes.
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about progressive taxation
<em>brainly.com/question/1601662</em>
#SPJ1
Answer: False
Explanation:
The U.S. Supreme Court doesn't defines materiality as "the magnitude of an omission or misstatement of accounting information that, in light of surrounding circumstances, makes it probable that the judgment of a reasonable person relying on the information would have been changed or influenced by the omission or misstatement." Instead, materiality is defined as “generally states that information is material if there is a substantial likelihood that the omitted or misstated item would have been viewed by a reasonable resource provider as having significantly altered the total mix of information,”
