Answer:
balance the rights of both parties
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in a situation like the one being described a court will generally balance the rights of both parties. This is done in order to make sure that both parties are being treated fairly and investigate both sides of the case before making a decision in regards to who is in the right and who is in the wrong.
Answer:
If patty sues, the likely result is:
D. Patty may win under the doctrine of promissory estoppel.
Explanation:
Here, in the given question it is mentioned that Patty is a student who is poor and he is struggling to work and also keep up with her studies inspite of the difficulties.
Her uncle, Fred, promises patty that he will help him in this situation and help her with an amount of $200 per month for the next six months.
Although her uncle, Fred didn't ask her to but patty by herself quits her job so that she gives her maximum time and attention to her studies for the six months in which her uncle was going to help her.
According to what hr uncle promised he gave her the amount which he promised to but this was done for a month and then without saying anything or giving any reason he stopped giving her the amount he promised to.
So, now in this scenario if patty sues the likely result would be:
d. Patty may win under the doctrine of promissory estoppel.
Answer:
Call for someone then you need to help them as much as you can
Answer:
The correct answer is C. Only John's commission will be counted in the U.S.
Explanation:
When developing a job that generates income in St. Louis, it is considered that any sale you make because you are within the United States is taken into account within the GNP. For its part, the country that produced the car should consider it as GDP because it is part of the production carried out in a different jurisdiction.
i ant good but my teacher is cool and told my the answer
