1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
r-ruslan [8.4K]
3 years ago
5

What is the answer for this question-7x-2y=-13

Mathematics
1 answer:
Gala2k [10]3 years ago
5 0
What are you trying to find? y?x?..???
You might be interested in
2. Factor completely: f(x) = x4 - 6x2? – 27
VladimirAG [237]

Answer:

sorry don't know answer

6 0
3 years ago
Is this the answer for the questions if not can you please send them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
melomori [17]
2 is 2
3 is number 3
4 is 2
5 0
3 years ago
The Wall Street Journal Corporate Perceptions Study 2011 surveyed readers and asked how each rated the Quality of Management and
natali 33 [55]

Answer:

a)\chi^2 = \frac{(40-35)^2}{35}+\frac{(35-40)^2}{40}+\frac{(25-25)^2}{25}+\frac{(25-24.5)^2}{24.5}+\frac{(35-28)^2}{28}+\frac{(25-17.5)^2}{17.5}+\frac{(5-10.5)^2}{10.5}+\frac{(10-12)^2}{12}+\frac{(15-7.5)^2}{7.5} =17.03

p_v = P(\chi^2_{4} >17.03)=0.0019

And we can find the p value using the following excel code:

"=1-CHISQ.DIST(17.03,4,TRUE)"

Since the p value is lower than the significance level we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance, and we can conclude that we have association or dependence between the two variables.

b)

P(E|Ex)= P(EΛEx )/ P(Ex) = (40/215)/ (70/215)= 40/70=0.5714

P(E|Gx)= P(EΛGx )/ P(Gx) = (35/215)/ (80/215)= 35/80=0.4375

P(E|Fx)= P(EΛFx )/ P(Fx) = (25/215)/ (50/215)= 25/50=0.5

P(G|Ex)= P(GΛEx )/ P(Ex) = (25/215)/ (70/215)= 25/70=0.357

P(G|Gx)= P(GΛGx )/ P(Gx) = (35/215)/ (80/215)= 35/80=0.4375

P(G|Fx)= P(GΛFx )/ P(Fx) = (10/215)/ (50/215)= 10/50=0.2

P(F|Ex)= P(FΛEx )/ P(Ex) = (5/215)/ (70/215)= 5/70=0.0714

P(F|Gx)= P(FΛGx )/ P(Gx) = (10/215)/ (80/215)= 10/80=0.125

P(F|Fx)= P(FΛFx )/ P(Fx) = (15/215)/ (50/215)= 15/50=0.3

And that's what we see here almost all the conditional probabilities are higher than 0.2 so then the conclusion of dependence between the two variables makes sense.

Step-by-step explanation:

A chi-square goodness of fit test "determines if a sample data matches a population".

A chi-square test for independence "compares two variables in a contingency table to see if they are related. In a more general sense, it tests to see whether distributions of categorical variables differ from each another".

Assume the following dataset:

Quality management        Excellent      Good     Fair    Total

Excellent                                40                35         25       100

Good                                      25                35         10         70

Fair                                         5                   10          15        30

Total                                       70                 80         50       200

Part a

We need to conduct a chi square test in order to check the following hypothesis:

H0: There is independence between the two categorical variables

H1: There is association between the two categorical variables

The level of significance assumed for this case is \alpha=0.05

The statistic to check the hypothesis is given by:

\chi^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{(O_i -E_i)^2}{E_i}

The table given represent the observed values, we just need to calculate the expected values with the following formula E_i = \frac{total col * total row}{grand total}

And the calculations are given by:

E_{1} =\frac{70*100}{200}=35

E_{2} =\frac{80*100}{200}=40

E_{3} =\frac{50*100}{200}=25

E_{4} =\frac{70*70}{200}=24.5

E_{5} =\frac{80*70}{200}=28

E_{6} =\frac{50*70}{200}=17.5

E_{7} =\frac{70*30}{200}=10.5

E_{8} =\frac{80*30}{200}=12

E_{9} =\frac{50*30}{200}=7.5

And the expected values are given by:

Quality management        Excellent      Good     Fair       Total

Excellent                                35              40          25         100

Good                                      24.5           28          17.5        85

Fair                                         10.5            12           7.5         30

Total                                       70                 80         65        215

And now we can calculate the statistic:

\chi^2 = \frac{(40-35)^2}{35}+\frac{(35-40)^2}{40}+\frac{(25-25)^2}{25}+\frac{(25-24.5)^2}{24.5}+\frac{(35-28)^2}{28}+\frac{(25-17.5)^2}{17.5}+\frac{(5-10.5)^2}{10.5}+\frac{(10-12)^2}{12}+\frac{(15-7.5)^2}{7.5} =17.03

Now we can calculate the degrees of freedom for the statistic given by:

df=(rows-1)(cols-1)=(3-1)(3-1)=4

And we can calculate the p value given by:

p_v = P(\chi^2_{4} >17.03)=0.0019

And we can find the p value using the following excel code:

"=1-CHISQ.DIST(17.03,4,TRUE)"

Since the p value is lower than the significance level we can reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance, and we can conclude that we have association or dependence between the two variables.

Part b

We can find the probabilities that Quality of Management and the Reputation of the Company would be the same like this:

Let's define some notation first.

E= Quality Management excellent     Ex=Reputation of company excellent

G= Quality Management good     Gx=Reputation of company good

F= Quality Management fait     Ex=Reputation of company fair

P(EΛ Ex) =40/215=0.186

P(GΛ Gx) =35/215=0.163

P(FΛ Fx) =15/215=0.0697

If we have dependence then the conditional probabilities would be higher values.

P(E|Ex)= P(EΛEx )/ P(Ex) = (40/215)/ (70/215)= 40/70=0.5714

P(E|Gx)= P(EΛGx )/ P(Gx) = (35/215)/ (80/215)= 35/80=0.4375

P(E|Fx)= P(EΛFx )/ P(Fx) = (25/215)/ (50/215)= 25/50=0.5

P(G|Ex)= P(GΛEx )/ P(Ex) = (25/215)/ (70/215)= 25/70=0.357

P(G|Gx)= P(GΛGx )/ P(Gx) = (35/215)/ (80/215)= 35/80=0.4375

P(G|Fx)= P(GΛFx )/ P(Fx) = (10/215)/ (50/215)= 10/50=0.2

P(F|Ex)= P(FΛEx )/ P(Ex) = (5/215)/ (70/215)= 5/70=0.0714

P(F|Gx)= P(FΛGx )/ P(Gx) = (10/215)/ (80/215)= 10/80=0.125

P(F|Fx)= P(FΛFx )/ P(Fx) = (15/215)/ (50/215)= 15/50=0.3

And that's what we see here almost all the conditional probabilities are higher than 0.2 so then the conclusion of dependence between the two variables makes sense.

7 0
3 years ago
How do you solve the equation -7/8k=21
loris [4]
- \frac{7}{8} k = 21

First, simplify \frac{7}{8} k to \frac{7k}{8} / Your problem should look like: -\frac{7k}{8} = 21
Second, multiply both sides by 8. / Your problem should look like: -7k = 167
Third, divide both sides by -7. / Your problem should look like: k = \frac{168}{-7}
Fourth, simplify \frac{168}{-7} to \frac{168}{7} / Your problem should look like: k = - \frac{168}{7}
Fifth, simplify \frac{168}{7} to 24. / Your problem should look like: k = -24

Answer: k = -24

4 0
3 years ago
3\sqrt{-27x^6y^9} ????????
ivann1987 [24]

Answer: 9x^3 y^4 sqrt -3y

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is equivalent to −3(2n)2?
    6·1 answer
  • Evalute 16^1/2×2^-3.
    12·1 answer
  • 90 POINTS & Brainliest Is the following relation a function? Two circles are shown, one labeled x and the other labeled y. T
    5·2 answers
  • If y varies inversely with x, and y = -16 when x = -64, what is the constant of variation?
    15·2 answers
  • Bao Yu is completing the square to solve the polynomial equation. x^2-x-3=0 what should be her first step?
    7·1 answer
  • How much inches are in 50 feet
    13·1 answer
  • Can someone help wit this asap i have 10 more mins
    14·1 answer
  • Pls helpppppppppppppppp
    14·2 answers
  • Can someone help me please
    10·1 answer
  • What is the area of circle with a radius of 2.45 cm?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!