Answer:
Los Adeas
Explanation:
In 1729, Los Adaes was designated the capital of Texas and served as such until 1770. Los Adaes was built as a response to the French Fort St. Jean Baptiste in Natchitoches, and the two outposts were linked directly throughout their existence.
Hope that helps!
Answer:
a. the reasons for our attitudes or feelings are ambiguous
Explanation:
The Self-perception theory suggests that individuals tend to perceive their own behaviors as good or bad or acceptable or unacceptable and then this affects their own feelings and attitudes. In addition to this fact, it has also been reported that people tend to infer their attitudes and their preferences based on their behaviors not only when they are observing themselves but also when they are behaving unconsciously. This means that people infer feelings from their own behavior and actions and since these feelings can be interpreted in multiple ways hence they are ambiguous. Therefore, option a is the correct answer.
Pretty sure it's linked to the rise in dictators. Ex: Hitler, the leader of italy at the time, and in Russia.
<span />
Answer:
No, he is not guilty of criminal fraud because of
Explanation:
Roger is the CFO of a corporation and had a business dinner with some of the company's largest shareholders. Roger knowingly and intentionally started drinking a variety of alcoholic drinks and even excused himself to secretly snort cocaine in the men's room. By the end of the evening, he obviously intoxicated. His dinner companions kept buying more rounds of drinks, and Roger needed no urging to continue drinking. By dessert, he was obviously extremely intoxicated. At that point, his companions asked him to sign a variety of documents, which he did not read due to his condition. The documents turned out to be falsified financial statements, which were then supplied to the accountants who were auditing the company. Is Roger guilty of criminal fraud?
No,he is not guilty of criminal fraud because he was intoxicated, he likely could not have formed the required mens rea and would not be guilty of criminal fraud
.If voluntarily intoxicated to the point that criminal intent cannot be realized or formed, a defendant would not be guilty