<h3>Answer: The lines are perpendicular</h3>
=================================================
Work Shown:
Use the slope formula to find the slope of the line through the two given points.
m = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)
m = (-4 - (-5))/(6 - (-7))
m = (-4 + 5)/(6 + 7)
m = 1/13
The slope of the line through the two given points is 1/13.
This is not equal to -13, which was the slope of the first line, so the two lines are not parallel.
However, the two lines are perpendicular because multiplying the two slope values leads to -1
(slope1)*(slope2) = (-13)*(1/13) = -1
note: It might help to think of -13 as -13/1 to help multiply the fractions.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The method applied in this scenario is called simple random sampling. A sample of 100 customers is chosen from a larger population of customers and each customer has the same chance of being selected for the survey at any given time. Also, the chance of selecting 100 customers from each store is the same during the sampling process. The order of sampling at each store does not follow a certain order, thus, It is different from systematic random sampling.
I think it would be A because if you multiply the square by a 30 thinking there all the same space between it will give u 120 square yards
Answer:
For this case we want to check if the true mean for the depth of groves cut into aluminium by a machine is equal to 1.7 (null hypothesis) and the alternative hypothesis would be the complement different from 1.7. And the best system of hypothesis are:
Null hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis ![\mu \neq 1.7[/tx]And the best system of hypothesis are:3. This two-sided test: H0: μ = 1.7 mm H1: μ ≠ 1.7 mmStep-by-step explanation:For this case we want to check if the true mean for the depth of groves cut into aluminium by a machine is equal to 1.7 (null hypothesis) and the alternative hypothesis would be the complement different from 1.7. And the best system of hypothesis are:Null hypothesis: [tex]\mu =1.7](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmu%20%5Cneq%201.7%5B%2Ftx%5D%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EAnd%20the%20best%20system%20of%20hypothesis%20are%3A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3E3.%20This%20two-sided%20test%3A%0A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EH0%3A%20%CE%BC%20%3D%201.7%20mm%0A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EH1%3A%20%CE%BC%20%E2%89%A0%201.7%20mm%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EStep-by-step%20explanation%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EFor%20this%20case%20we%20want%20to%20check%20if%20the%20true%20mean%20for%20the%20depth%20of%20groves%20cut%20into%20aluminium%20by%20a%20machine%20is%20equal%20to%201.7%20%28null%20hypothesis%29%20and%20the%20alternative%20hypothesis%20would%20be%20the%20complement%20different%20from%201.7.%20And%20the%20best%20system%20of%20hypothesis%20are%3A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3ENull%20hypothesis%3A%20%5Btex%5D%5Cmu%20%3D1.7)
Alternative hypothesis [tex]\mu \neq 1.7[/tx]
And the best system of hypothesis are:
3. This two-sided test:
H0: μ = 1.7 mm
H1: μ ≠ 1.7 mm