Answer:
C. By realizing gains through increase in share price and cash divideneds.
Explanation:
For most corporations, the management must strive to ensure the firm is doing well in the market space. Once a company is doing well, it will affect its share price positively on the stock exchange.
An increase in the share price of fim is a gain to the firm and its corporate owners. I.e sharedholders. This means that the value of their investment in the firm has appreciated.
Furthermore, the firm must try to make profit which is one of the reason of being in business. A firm that is making profit will be able to declare same at the end of the financial period, hence corporate holders(shareholders) would be have part in profit declaration through dividened.
D. Appointments to the Supreme Court must be apptoved in the Senate.
not sure though
Answer:
With respect to the employment-at-will doctrine, this is "An exception based on public policy"
Explanation:
Under the public-policy exception to employment at will, an employee is wrongfully discharged when the termination violates an explicit, well-established public policy of the state. For example, in most states, an employer can't terminate an employee for filing a workers' compensation claim after being injured on the job, or for refusing to engage in illegal activity at the request of an employer.
Public policy may be found in a state constitution, statute, administrative rule, or other state policy. The public-policy exception is the most commonly accepted exception, recognized in the vast majority of states.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. result from the political bias toward immediate benefits and deferred costs.
Explanation:
While many people run hysterically on the streets begging politicians to act in the face of the threat of climate change, many people, young and old, may be demanding the same type of action, but to fix the unfunded passive systems.
By extending eligibility and increasing the benefits of a pay-per-use system while at the same time having fewer children to finance it, previous generations have left a fearsome financial obligation. Either taxes will increase dramatically for tomorrow's workers, lowering their standard of living, or benefits will fall for tomorrow's retirees, lowering their standard of living. A group will feel very angry.
These problems were anticipated even when politicians were raising payments, but each elected government simply kicked the can and allowed things to continue as usual.
Social security systems and pension funds are actuarially not funded systems. There is no obligation for this generation to have children at the same rate as previous generations. Therefore, when those born in the 1950s reach retirement age in the next century, their stipends will feel more like a burden due to the ranks of non-active members of society that will depend on their contributions to live.
Answer:
im sorryi wish i was good at math
Explanation:
im failing math btw
