Answer:
If an economist argues that everyone gains from trade, the following reasoning is most likely underlying her argument:
- Production according to the principle of comparative advantage lowers overall costs and therefore allows both countries to have a higher standard of living.
Explanation:
- The comparative advantage refer to the situation in which an individual, company or a country offers its services and products at a lower rate as compared to its competitor. This leads to trade-off as you have to comprise for the gain of something.
- This comparative advantage also increase the dependencies of nations or companies on each other.
- For example, England and Portugal has benefited from this comparative advantage concept as England get the wine at lower cost from Portugal and Portugal also get earning by selling this wine to England.
Answer: No,the company is not guilty.
Explanation: In the given case, Hines could not be considered guilty of price discrimination as the price charged from different shops was same. The free samples were distributed for the purpose of campaign and the discretion to which shop they want to provide lies completely with the company.
Price discrimination refers to the practice of charging different prices from different customer which the company have definitely not done.
Hence, Hines could not be charged of guilty of price discrimination.
Answer:
D if this is anything related to business then there is always something that reviews everything and the most common term for it is Master scheduling.
Explanation:
Answer:
3.33%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Real per capita GDP in South Korea in 1957 = $400
per capita GDP in South Korea in 1978 = $800
Total number of years taken to double the GDP = 21 years
Now,
Using the Rule of 70, which states that
Number of years to double the GDP = 70 ÷ (average annual economic growth rate )
thus,
21 years = 70 ÷ average annual economic growth rate
or
Average annual economic growth rate = 3.33%
The answers are the following:
a.
Brandon:
$7,000 + [($10,000/4)×3¿= $8,500
Ryan:
$7,000 + [($10,000/4)×1¿= $7,500
b.
Brandon $7,000
Ryan <span>$7,000</span>
