1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lunna [17]
3 years ago
10

David prepares and serves lunch to a group of friends. The next day, several of the friends are suffering from food poisoning. W

hich of the following suggests that David's food was correlated to, but did not cause, the food poisoning?
please hurry!!
History
2 answers:
horsena [70]3 years ago
4 0
The friends who got food poisoning all ate at the same restaurant for dinner, while the friends who did not get food poisoning did not.
Food poisoning is basically contaminated food. The main cause of food poisoning is bacteria. It is estimated that there are over 250 bacteria that can cause food poisoning. Correlation is the act of something have a causative relation with an effect.
Bingel [31]3 years ago
4 0

The friends who got food poisoning all ate at the same restaurant for dinner, while the friends who did not get food poisoning did not.

You might be interested in
What do Matthew, Mark, Luke,
fenix001 [56]

Answer:D there considered the Gospels in the new testament

Explanation:Although Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John have much material in common, each one has material not duplicated by the others. It is interesting to notice how many points of agreement there are in the four New Testament Gospels. Matthew, Mark, and Luke are very similar, but even they are not identical in outline or detail.

5 0
2 years ago
In what way were Auguste Comte and Immanuel Kant alike?
yKpoI14uk [10]
Auguste Comte and Immanuel Kant were alike in the fact that they both felt like science would improve the world. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did president johnson commit more troops to fight on the ground in vietnam?
Aliun [14]

<span>President Johnson committed more troops to fight on the ground in Vietnam</span><span> because he faced an overwhelming political pressure for a hard-line approach on communism. Moreover, President Johnson was acting in response to the US commitment to succeed in Vietnam. He also envisaged countering the Domino effect through containment.</span>

4 0
3 years ago
What is your opinion about the Vietnam War?
sertanlavr [38]
Was a bloody and useless war ended nothing solders were on drugs and super sick and tired.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the 1980s, President Ronald Reagan and the Republican Party
dexar [7]

Answer:

The answer would be D

Explanation:

Hope this helps. Can you please mark me Brainliest?

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Place where the Greek fleet attacked the persian fleet
    12·2 answers
  • Who was the most powerful Elder God who ruled over the other Titans?
    10·1 answer
  • When fighting began in the Korean War in 1950, what major advantage did North Korea possess?
    7·1 answer
  • Please I need help lolz
    12·1 answer
  • How can the modern era be distinguished from other eras in history?
    13·1 answer
  • What did Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler have in common? Provide at least three examples.
    6·1 answer
  • Why do you think that it was important to transport natural resources to the east and Northeast
    11·1 answer
  • Why would flatboats not work on all means of river transportation?
    14·1 answer
  • History please help!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • In what significant way did the Bush Doctrine differ from the Truman
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!