When children are officially interviewed about their recollections of possible sexual abuse, their reports are especially credib
le if: they are asked specific, detailed questions about the issue rather than more general, open-ended questions. after responding to an interviewer, they are repeatedly asked the same question they just answered. they use anatomically correct dolls to indicate if and where they had been physically touched. involved adults have not discussed the issue with them prior to the interview?
When children are officially interviewed about their recollections of possible sexual abuse, their reports are especially credible if "involved adults have not discussed the issue with them prior to the interview.
"
A child is sexually abused when they are constrained or influenced to participate in sexual exercises. This doesn't need to be physical contact and it can happen on the web. Some of the time the tyke won't comprehend that the end result for's them is mishandle. They may not comprehend that it's off-base. Or then again they might be reluctant to stand up. That is the reason we're attempting to end the quietness around youngster sexual mishandle, and give kids a voice when they frantically require support.
B. The higher up a mountain you go, the colder it tends to get (and in my experience, the drier too, but I don't want to assume that's always the case), therefore the number of plants that can survive tends to decrease.
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the study is an example of Structural Functionalism. In the context of sociology, this term refers to a theory made in order to explain why society functions in the way that it does, by emphasizing relationships between social institutions and society. Therefore a study attempting to find out why society likes a certain story as opposed to another one would be an example of this theory.
