In case A, as the error would be a difference of 1, the assumption could be mantained, but in case B the difference will be bigger, showing that the ratio is not 3:1 but 4:1.
<h3><u>Ratios</u></h3>
Given that a preliminary study was carried out to test the hypothesis that the ratio of white to dark herons on the island was 3:1, but A) a small census found 16 white morphs and 4 dark, to determine if the assumption of a 3 :1 ratio could be rejected, and B) to determine the same question if the census were larger with 160 white morphs and 40 dark, the following calculations must be made:
A)
- 3 + 1 = 4
- 16 + 4 = 20
- 4 = 20
- 3 = X
- 60 / 4 = X
- 15 = X
- Therefore, as the error would be a difference of 1, the assumption could be mantained.
B)
- 3 + 1 = 4
- 160 + 40 = 200
- 150 = 3:1
- In this case, the difference will be bigger, showing that the ratio is not 3:1 but 4:1.
Learn more about ratios in brainly.com/question/1504221
Answer:
The vertex is (2, 3)
Step-by-step explanation:
This is because the parent equation for problems like these is y=a(x-h)2 +k. The vertex is found through (h, k) and so with 2 as H and 3 as K, the vertex is (2,3).
I am pretty sure it’s c because you go up 4 and over 3 to the right so that would be plus 3
That is a 45 45 90 triangle.
The legs of such a triangle equal the hypotenuse divided by the sq root of 2
So each leg equals 125.5 cm divided by
<span>
<span>
<span>
1.4142135624
</span>
</span>
</span>
which equals
<span>
<span>
<span>
88.7419010389
</span>
</span>
</span>
or to the nearest 100th of a centimeter:
88.74
389,422 rounded is 400,000.
