1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vinvika [58]
2 years ago
6

Taxes on the property Buyer Alan is purchasing are $3,200 due on December 31. If the closing is set for October 15, using the 36

5-day method, how much of the taxes will be credited to the buyer?A) The seller's share of $2,533.38B) The buyer's share of $666.62C) The seller's share of $2,525.76D) The buyer's share of $674.24
Business
1 answer:
lisabon 2012 [21]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

C). The seller's share of $2,525.76

Explanation:

The 365-day assumes a total of 365 days in a year. So the number of days up to when the closing is set should be determined as shown;

<em>Step 1: Determine total number of days up to October 15</em>

Total days up to October 15=Number of days in January+number of days in February+number of days in March+number of days in April+number of days in May+number of days in June+number of days in July+number of days in August+number of days in September+number of days up to October 15

where;

number of days in January=31

number of days in February=28

number of days in March=31

number of days in April=30

number of days in May=31

number of days in June=30

number of days in July=31

number of days in August=31

number of days in September=30

number of days up to October 15=15

replacing;

Total days up to October 15=(31+28+31+30+31+30+31+31+30+15)=288 days

<em>Step 2: Determine the amount of taxes that will be credited to the buyer</em>

Sellers share=(number of days up to October 15/total number of days in a year)×Taxes due on December 31

where;

number of days up to October 15=288 days

total number of days in a year=365

Taxes due on December 31=$3,200

replacing;

Sellers share=(288/365)×3,200=2,524.93 which is approximately equal to 2,525.76

The seller's share of $2,525.76

You might be interested in
a study in the construction industy found that when equipment was stolen from worksites, in 82% of the cases workers were the th
Natasha2012 [34]

Employers in the construction sector would benefit most from the validation of personnel selection information to aid in reducing employee theft.

<h3>What is validation?</h3>
  • The data support the hypothesis that reducing theft would result from the hiring of qualified workers without criminal records.
  • Effectiveness is measured by validity.
  • Therefore, if tests properly and accurately measure what they are intended to assess AND if tests are demonstrated to yield consistent findings over time, validation and dependability in hiring tools are present.
  • Accepting someone else's views, feelings, and emotions are known as validation.
  • The act of rejecting, criticizing, or ignoring someone else's opinions, sentiments, emotions, or behaviors is known as invalidation.

Therefore, validation of employee selection information would employers in the construction industry receive the greatest benefit in helping reduce employee theft.

Know more about validation here:

brainly.com/question/13262566

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
Assume the union freeman works with pays newer employees less than ones who have been with the organization for a longer time. w
Monica [59]

Assume the union freeman works with pays newer employees less than ones who have been with the organization for a longer time. The basis for this is: two tier contract.

<h3>What is two tier contract?</h3>

Two tier contract can be defined as the way in which employee who work in an organization does not earn the same wages as some employee earn higher wages that others while some earn lesser wages.

Hence, if  newer employees earn lesser  than those who have been with the organization for a longer time. The basis for this is called  two tier contract.

Learn more about Two tier contract here:brainly.com/question/984979

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
1. Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to ensure that investors invest only in companies that will be profitable.
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

1. False

2. False

3. False

4. True

5. True

Explanation:

1.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act was a federal law that was established by congress to sweep auditing and financial statements for public companies. The main aim for this was to improve the investor confidence by improving reliability in accounting statements. Errors in the financial statements for the public companies were to be minimized following this law especially in the wake of numerous cases of corporate crime. This law was never passed to ensure that investors only invest in companies that will be profitable, since the choice of which company to invest in is exclusively left to the investor. So the above statement is false.

2.

Ethics can be defined as a set of rules and regulation that govern the moral behavior of someone. Ethical standards vary from one region to another since they are majorly cultural, for example; a behavior in the United States can be considered as appropriate while the same behavior in a different place can be inappropriate. Ethical standards are either right or wrong, and the actions are judged on these terms. Ethics don't measure whether a actions are loyal or disloyal, thus the statement is false.

3.

The primary accounting standard setting body in the United States is Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). This body is charged with regulating and setting the best standard of accounting practice. The FASB usually constitutes a board whose officials are rigorously assessed. The board members have to be professionals in the field of accounting.  Securities and Exchange Commission on the other hand is an independent federal agency with the authority to enforce federal security laws. Thus the statement above is false.

4.

The historical cost principle suggests that the companies record assets cost at their original cost and continue to report them at their original cost over the time the asset is held. The historical cost principle is a generally accepted accounting principle that has been in use for a long time. The definition about the historical cost principle in the question above is therefor true.

5.

The monetary unit assumption dictates that business related activities be converted to monetary units. There are some business transactions that are however quite difficult to convert into monetary units, therefor the accountant in using this principle is only obliged to record only the transactions that can be measured in money terms. The statement about monetary units in the question above is thus true.

8 0
3 years ago
Liang Company began operations in Year 1. During its first two years, the company completed a number of transactions involving s
horsena [70]

Answer:

1). Account receivables A/c Dr. $1,345,000

                 To sales revenue  A/c $1,345,000

(Being the sales revenue is recorded)

Cost of good sold A/c Dr. $975,700

          To merchandise inventory A/c $975,700

(Being the cost is recorded)

2. Allowance for doubtful accounts A/c Dr. $19,400

       To accounts receivable A/c $19,400

(Being the written off is recorded)

3. Cash A/c Dr. $670,800

           To accounts receivables A/c $670,800

(Being cash received is recorded

1. .Account receivable A/c Dr. $1,529,400

                    To sales A/c $1,529,400

(Being the sales revenue is recorded)

Cost of good sold A/c Dr. $1,332,100

          To merchandise inventory A/c $1,332,100

(Being the cost of goods sold  is recorded)

2. Allowance for doubtful accounts A/c Dr. $27,000

        To Account receivable A/c $27,000

(Being the written off amount is recorded)

3. Cash A/c Dr. $1,391,600

            To account receivable A/c $1,391,600

(Being the cash received is recorded)

4. Bad-debts expense A/c Dr. $28,000

(765,600 × 1% + 20,344)

    To allowance for doubtful accounts A/c $28,000

(Being the bad debt expense is recorded)

Working note:

Ending Receivables = (654800 + 1529400 - 27,000 - 1,391,600) = $765,600

Total Receivables of 1st Year = 1,345,000 - 19,400 - 670,800 = $654,800

Before Adjustment Ending Allowance Balance = 65,4800 × 1% - 27,000

= 6,548 - 27,000

= 20,344 Debit BalanceThe journal entries are shown below:

According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follows:-

Journal Entries for 1st year

1). Account receivables A/c Dr. $1,345,000

                 To sales revenue  A/c $1,345,000

(Being the sales revenue is recorded)

Cost of good sold A/c Dr. $975,700

          To merchandise inventory A/c $975,700

(Being the cost is recorded)

2. Allowance for doubtful accounts A/c Dr. $19,400

       To accounts receivable A/c $19,400

(Being the written off is recorded)

3. Cash A/c Dr. $670,800

           To accounts receivables A/c $670,800

(Being cash received is recorded)

4.  Bad-debts expense A/c Dr. $38,389

(1,345,000-19,400-670,800) × 2.90+ $19,400

          To allowance for doubtful accounts A/c $38,389

(Being the bad debt expense is recorded)

Journal Entries for 2nd year

1. .Account receivable A/c Dr. $1,529,400

                    To sales A/c $1,529,400

(Being the sales revenue is recorded)

Cost of good sold A/c Dr. $1,332,100

          To merchandise inventory A/c $1,332,100

(Being the cost of goods sold  is recorded)

2. Allowance for doubtful accounts A/c Dr. $27,000

        To Account receivable A/c $27,000

(Being the written off amount is recorded)

3. Cash A/c Dr. $1,391,600

            To account receivable A/c $1,391,600

(Being the cash received is recorded)

4. Bad-debts expense A/c Dr. $28,000

(765,600 × 1% + 20,344)

    To allowance for doubtful accounts A/c $28,000

(Being the bad debt expense is recorded)

Working note:

Ending Receivables = (654800 + 1529400 - 27,000 - 1,391,600) = $765,600

Total Receivables of 1st Year = 1,345,000 - 19,400 - 670,800 = $654,800

Before Adjustment Ending Allowance Balance = 65,4800 × 1% - 27,000

= 6,548 - 27,000

= 20,344 Debit Balance

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
What is a downside of receiving a tax<br> refund?
Dmitry [639]

Answer:

It's a free loan to the government.

Explanation:

you're essentially giving the government a free loan with no interest.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the most accurate method for preventing adverse effects associated with the use of digoxin?
    11·1 answer
  • North Around, Inc. stock is expected to return 22 percent in a boom, 13 percent in a normal economy, and −15 percent in a recess
    11·1 answer
  • A company is obligated to pay its creditors $6,100 at the end of the year. If the value of the company's assets equals $5,800 at
    8·1 answer
  • On January 1, Revis Consulting entered into a contract to complete a cost reduction program for Green Financial over a six-month
    8·1 answer
  • promissory note received from a customer in exchange for an account receivable is recorded by the payee as
    11·1 answer
  • Elmer Sporting Goods is getting ready to produce a new line of golf clubs by investing $1.85 million. The investment will result
    12·1 answer
  • You are hired as a strategic analyst for a Fortune 500 company. Your first task is to develop a competitive intelligence report
    9·1 answer
  • Kitchen chairs are purchased wholesale for $36 each by a discount furniture store. Then, the store marks up the chairs by 60 per
    14·1 answer
  • FACTS: Your second client is a 42-year-old man. He graduated high school and then immediately started working for a lumberyard i
    6·1 answer
  • _________ _________ is often solved with the broker representing both sides designating a separate agent for both buyer and sell
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!