Answer:
A. National-security argument
Explanation:
The National-security argument is also known as the National-defense argument. The argument proposes the imposition of high tariffs on locally manufactured goods so that the country would not be dependent on other countries for those goods in the event of war. For example, if a country is dependent on other counties for the production of food, then it would be in great danger in the advent of war. Tires that are also used to prepare weapons should be sourced within a country so that in the advent of war, the country would not be dependent on others.
This is the argument employed by the congresswoman who sought the imposition of a tariff on tires so that the United States would not be dependent on other foreign countries during a war.
This arrangement is ethical as long as the engineer signs and seals each design segment only after it has been reviewed by an independent consulting engineer who specializes in the field which it pertains.<span> If what she was dealing is not her field of expertise, she needs to have the aid of independent engineer who can verify the work passed to her before she signs the design segment.</span>
<span>Answer: D. Karl Marx's collapse of capitalism.</span>
Answer:
1. 2006 Student
2. 4400 pesos left
Explanation:
If each student had $500 to spend and In 2002, the exchange rate of MXN/USD (Mexican pesos to U.S. dollars) was 9 and In 2006, the exchange rate was 11.
If the hotel room in Guadalajara cost 200 pesos per night in 2002 and 220 pesos in 2006 and each student spent five nights in a hotel, which student had more pesos left over:
Student A - 2002
Spent 5 nights x 200 pesos = 1000 pesos
Total pesos = $500 x 9 = 4500 pesos
Pesos left = 4500 - 1000 = 3500 pesos
Student B - 2006
Spent 5 nights x 220 pesos = 1100 pesos
Total pesos = $500 x 11 = 5500 pesos
Pesos left = 5500 - 1100 = 4400 pesos
Answer:
when good are free of charge
Explanation:
