Full page slide is your answer :)
Answer:
Supplier's quotation (2,400 x $6.25) 150,000
Less: Relevant cost of production:
Direct material (2,400 x $31) 74,400
Direct labour (2,400 x $18) 43,200
Variable overhead (2,400 x $9) <u>21,600</u> <u>139,200</u>
Savings <u> 10,800</u>
The parts should be produced in-house since the relevant cost of production is lower than supplier's quotation.
Explanation:
In this case, we need to compare supplier's quotation to the relevant cost of production. The price of $6.25 above was computed by dividing the total price charged by the supplier by the number of parts. Moreso, the relevant cost of production is obtained by the aggregate of direct material, direct labour and variable overhead.
The following that most strongly implied by this information is that at the current level of production, the firm is making a profit of $3000. Jake and Mathew will most likely agree on The firm should increase production from the current level. Mathew is assuming that no new firms enter the market in the short run.
Answer: the correct answer is d. transaction-risk scoring software.
Explanation: The additional security option, used for credit card transactions, that keeps track of a customer’s historical shopping patterns and notes deviations from the norm is <u>transaction-risk scoring software.</u>
Answer:
$109,000
Explanation:
The accounting equation for the cost of goods sold
COGS = opening finished good + purchases - Closing finished goods
In a manufacturing firm, purchases are also referred to as manufacturing costs.
For Leslie manufacturing:
beginning finished inventory =$40,000
costs of goods manufactured = $ 144,000
Ending finished inventory = $ 45,000
cost of manufacturing for the period:
=$40,000 +$114,000- $45,000
=$109,000
