The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P), developed by the UN, shows the growing importance of human rights by It is criticized for becoming a justification for intervention on behalf of state interests not related to protection of human rights.
<h3>The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P)?</h3>
All Heads of State and Government endorsed the duty to safeguard populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity at the 2005 World Summit. Three equally important pillars support the responsibility to protect (commonly abbreviated as "R2P"): the obligation of each State to protect its citizens (pillar I); the obligation of the international community to support States in protecting their citizens (pillar II); and the obligation of the international community to act when a State is blatantly failing to protect its citizens (pillar III). When the concept was adopted in 2005, it was a solemn commitment with high hopes for a world free of these atrocities.
- There are several circumstances in today's world where populations are at risk of R2P crimes or where such crimes are already occurring. These crises are occurring in a climate of waning internationalism, declining adherence to international human rights and humanitarian law, political division in important decision-making bodies like the Security Council, and a degree of defeatism toward advancing ambitious agendas like protection.
- Alarming contempt for core principles of international law has been on display. We are witnessing widespread and egregious attacks on protected civilian sites, such as hospitals and schools, as well as on protected individuals, including humanitarian and health-care workers, in many of the armed conflicts that have broken out in recent years.
- The most severe transgressions of international humanitarian and human rights law, which may qualify as atrocity crimes, continue to be committed by the armed forces and auxiliary militia of States, which is a depressing reality given the rise of violent, non-state armed organizations.
- Similarly, governments do not hold those responsible for atrocity crimes accountable for their deeds. In order to prevent the investigation and prosecution of atrocity crimes, some States parties to the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court, are not collaborating with the Court or are even considering withdrawing from the Statute.
- The Security Council is becoming less willing to bring issues to the Court, and certain political figures obviously want to avoid being held accountable in court.
Learn more about Protect (R2P) here:
brainly.com/question/16179318
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
New Jersey - Argentina. The physical characteristics between the people from New Jersey and Argentina tend to be roughly the same since (ancestrally speaking) the population originated from European settlers. The only big difference is that Argentinian population tends to be on the skinnier side than New Jersey residents. Culturally speaking is where they set themselves apart since New Jersey is very culturally diverse with people that come from all over the world and share their culture here. Argentina has very little diversity and the culture is the same Country Wide.
The United States have fought a lot of wars. The U.S. prepared for war by the act of creating or building- up the military in preparation for deployment, they also do so by initiating a draft.
The president can issue Liberty Bond and advocate for public participation so as to raise money for the war efforts. The military through the draft, people volunteer to fight for thier country.
US prepare for World war 1 through the financing, transportation, equipment, food, and men. Through the call for public support, people gave voluntary to support war.
Learn more about War from
brainly.com/question/12324560
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
Transportation issues, and they cannot afford to go without pay because of housing etc.
Answer:
through the abolition of slavery
Explanation:
US President Abraham Lincoln called for the abolition of slavery as a condition for the reintegration of southern states.
