I hope this helps you! it's relatively straightforward but if you need more explanations, don't hesitate to ask!
Answer:
A: 1,590.00
Step-by-step explanation:
We can use the simple interest rate equation for this problem: p(1 + r)^t
Step 1: Replace the variables with the amounts given
10000(1 + 0.03)^5
Step 2: Solve/Plug in calc
You will get 1590.00
Answer: Yes.
Step-by-step explanation:
You can graph it without being on zero or in an infinite decimal
Answer:
B. There is an association because the value 0.15 is not similar to the value 0.55
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the above picture, for the nutritionist to determine whether there is an association between where food is prepared and the number of calories the food contains, there must be an association between two categorical variables.
The conditions that satisfy whether there exists an association between conditional relative frequencies are:
1. When there is a bigger difference in the conditional relative frequencies, the stronger the association between the variables.
2. When the conditional relative frequencies are nearly equal for all categories, there may be no association between the variables.
For the given conditional relative frequency, we can see that there exists a significant difference between the columns of the table in the picture because 0.15 is significantly different from 0.55 and 0.85 is significantly different from 0.45
We can conclude that there is an association because the value 0.15 is not similar to the value 0.55
Answer: 2 1/4
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question, we are told that a recipe call for 3/4 c of chopped pecans
and that Brentt wants to triple the recipe .
The numerical expression that represents the amount of pecans he will need will be gotten by multiplying 3/4c by 3. This will be:
= 3 × 3/4c
= 9/4c
= 2 1/4
