Answer:
the probability the car was actually blue as claimed by the witness is 33.33%. This is a low percentage and thus, there is a reasonable doubt about the guilt of the client.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given;
P(car is blue) = 1% = 0.01
P(car is green) = 99% = 0.99
P(witness said blue | car is blue) = 99% = 0.99
P(witness said blue | car is green) = 2% = 0.02
We will solve this by using Bayes’ formula for inverting conditional probabilities:
Thus;
P(car is blue | witness said blue) =
[P(witness said blue | car is blue) × P(car is blue)] / [(P(witness said blue | car is blue) × P(car is blue)) + (P(witness said blue | car is green) × P(car is green))]
Plugging in the relevant values gives;
(0.99 × 0.01)/((0.99 × 0.01) + (0.02 × 0.99)) = 0.3333
Thus, the probability the car was actually blue as claimed by the witness is 0.3333 or 33.33%
Answer:
3 orders
Step-by-step explanation:
12 x .25=3
Answer:
141.12 cm^2
Step-by-step explanation:
A = 1/2 (b1+b2)h where b1 = 10.2, b2 = 12.2 and h = 12.6
so
A = 1/2(10.2 + 12.2) * (12.6)
A = 1/2(22.4)(12.6)
A = 141.12 cm^2
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
Linear equation form: y = mx + b
(where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept)
The rate of change for a line is the slope.
Function 1: y = 6
⇒ the slope is zero so the rate of change is zero
Function 2: y = 2x + 7
⇒ the slope is 2 so the rate of change is 2
Therefore, 2 - 0 = 2
So the rate of change of function 2 is 2 more than the rate of change of function 1
169.65 is the surface area....
don't know if that helps...
do i know you? is Mohamed your name
