The Stackelberg solution can be used to find the perfect or stable Nash equilibrium or equilibria.
<h3>What is this equilibrium about?</h3>
Other answers:
Based on the above, Note that the strategy profile is one where one serves best each player, and based on the strategies of the other player and it covers the fact that all player playing in a Nash equilibrium must be in every subgame.
Note also that The Stackelberg leadership model is said to be a kind off strategic game that is played in economics where the leader firm is known to moves first and then the follower firms is said to then move in a sequential manner and I think, the solution do not change if stackelberg game is considered in the long run.
I believe that the stackelberg leader will not collude with the stackelberg follower but in a lot of cases, there may be a collusion.
Yes, a Stackelberg leader can be more likely or less likely to merge with the follower firm as a merger can be profitable to them.
Learn more about equilibrium from
brainly.com/question/517289
#SPJ1
<u>Answer:</u> Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
The total compensation along with benefits are $72000. When the employee benefits calculated the annual gross pay given in option C . 12.5% interest calculated on $64000 will give total compensation of $72000.
Calculation of total compensation
Employee benefits = $64000 x 12.5/100
=$8000
Annual compensation= $64000 +$8000
=$72000
The correct answer is B. A debit to common stock distributed.
<em>The entry will be stock dividends debit, paid-in capital which is in excess per common credit stock, stock dividends which are being distributed.</em>
In credit entry it records distribution and declaration of stock dividend which includes the debit to the retained earnings and also a credit to the common stock.
Answer:
D) were highly likely to be in their lower-achieving group.
Explanation:
Theory X refers to a motivation theory developed by Douglas McGregor. Theory X can be described as a pessimistic view of humanity and human workers. Managers who support theory X tend to dislike their own work and believe everyone else dislikes their work, are not ambitious and believe everyone else is not ambitious either, and finally don't like to assume responsibility over their actions and believe everyone else is like them.
So it shouldn't be a surprise that managers who support theory X are underachievers.
Answer:
$ 10,867 F
Explanation:
Actual results$305,100
Flexible budget [$56,840+ ($2,874× 89) + ($13 ×257)]
$56,840+$255,786+$3,34= $315,967
Spending variance $ 10,867
($305,100-$315,967)
The spending variance for plane operating costs in November would be closest to $ 10,867 because the actual expense is less than the flexible budget, which makes the variance favorable (F)
