Answer: The consumption schedule shows the amounts households intend to consume at various possible levels of aggregate income.
Explanation: Consumption function, in economics, the relationship between consumer spending and the various factors determining it. At the household or family level, these factors may include income, wealth, expectations about the level and riskiness of future income or wealth, interest rates, age, education, and family size.
A consumption schedule is a table of numbers showing the relation between consumption expenditures and income for the household sector. The income measure commonly used is national income or disposable income. Occasionally a measure of aggregate production, such as gross domestic product, is used instead.
Ellie would have annual expenses of $15000+$3000+$1000+$1200+$35000=$55,200. If she cashed in her $20.000 deposit then her balance owing would be $35,200 so she would have to make at least this much or preferably the $55,200 to break even.,
Answer: C- Alzania's neighbor exported half its production of cotton that year
Explanation: Alzania produces and consumes 500,000 tons of cotton during a year. While, the neighbor which also employs the same number of people in the cotton industry, consumed 400,000 tons of cotton. There is no information on production of the neighbor. Just by looking at the consumption units we can argue that Alzania has an absolute advantage over the neighbor as it consumes more. However, if there is any information on the amount of exports of cotton from the neighbor then it will weaken the absolute advantage conclusion.
Thus, if <em>Alzania's neighbor exported half its production of cotton that year </em>the total production of cotton is greater of the neighbor than Alzania.
Answer:
0.5
Explanation:
A screenshot is attached to get the full solution
Since the coefficient is < 1, it is inelastic
c) a big recording company buys a small independent label
It is typical in capitalistic economies for larger companies to buy out their competition, absorbing smaller companies. This kind of economic change can result in large changes in management for the smaller companies because the company that now owns them may hire or fire people based on what they feel best meets the needs of the newly acquired company.
