Answer:
240°
Step-by-step explanation:
Draw a line EF perpendicular to AB and CD passing through M
In △BME
∠BME+∠MBE+∠BEM=180∘ (Angle sum proprerty)
∠BME+35∘+90∘=180∘∠BME=180∘−125∘∠BME=45∘
In △DMF
∠DMF+∠MDF+∠MFD=180∘ (Angle sum property )
∠DMF+75∘+90∘=180∘∠DMF=180∘−165∘∠DMF=15∘
x=∠DMF+∠BME+∠EMF
x=15∘+45∘+180∘x=240∘
Answer:
b. When you divide both sides by 2x = 6x it could lead us to think that there is no solution while, in fact, the solution is x = 0.
Step-by-step explanation:
The solution is correct up to the step 2x = 6x
2x = 6x
Subtract 2x from both sides.
0 = 4x
Divide both sides by 4.
x = 0
You cannot divide both sides by x since x could be zero, and in fact, it is.
Answer: b. When you divide both sides by 2x = 6x it could lead us to think that there is no solution while, in fact, the solution is x = 0.
<span>What is the next step in the proof? Choose the most logical approach. Statement: ∠1≅∠8 and ∠2≅∠7 Reason: Congruent Supplements Theorem Statement: m∠3+m∠4=180° and m∠7+m∠8=180° Reason: Linear Pair Theorem Statement: m∠3+m∠5=180° and m∠4+m∠6=180° Reason: definition of supplementary angles Statement: ∠7≅∠6 and ∠8≅∠5 Reason: Vertical Angles Theorem Done </span>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
B. for it to be a proper function, it must pass the vertical line test (meaning, if you were to fill a continuous line between each of the dots, and then drew a string vertical line down at any point along the function, that vertical line cannot intersect with the function line more than once.
A, would fail the vertical line test, C< and D would also fail, as a vertical line would intersect/cross the function line more than once.
Answer:
117
Step-by-step explanation:
