This is a personal question. Therefore, only you would be able to accurately analyze how it is that you evaluate options when making a decision. However, there are some common strategies that people follow when such a problem arises.
One example of such a strategy would be making a pros and cons list. This allows the person to better understand the problems and benefits of each approach. Another strategy would be working your way backwards. This involves thinking of the desired outcome first, and then retracing the steps that might lead you in that direction. A third example involves talking to people who have faced similar challenges and asking them for advice.
Answer:
c. temporal precedence
Explanation:
Temporal precedence is one among the three criterias that leads to a cause and effect relationship.
A temporal precedence entails that the criteria for assessing causation is that the causal variable must Precede the effect it is supposed
to cause.
This simply implies that the cause must come before the effect.
Hence, Mida trying to ensure that the cause of low grade was because of social, and making sure that social media comes before low grade. This is putting the cause of the low grade before the effect.
Therefore, the experiment is an example of temporal precedence research.
Answer:
Deductive Reasoning
Explanation:
The given condition is an example of deductive reasoning. Two arguments are related that bring a valid conclusion given the conditions hold true to both.
Deductive Reasoning: Process of making logical arguments by facts and logic.
Deduction:
Condition 1--- Jason can run 100 meter in 15 seconds
Condition 2--- Sarah is faster at racing any distance
Conclusion--- Sarah can run 100 meter in less than 15 seconds
Reason: Since Sarah is faster than Jason in any race therefore she can win run faster than him at any given condition. Jason runs 100 meter in 15 seconds which means Sarah can run the same distance in less than 15 seconds as she is faster than him.
The attitude of Fernando is best explained by the cognitive dissonance theory which is the one responsible for the person to gain the consistency with their beliefs, opinions, etc. With Fernando's attitude of changing from capital punishment to opposing argument best describes the said theory.
its C if im wrong then comment on this
