Answer:
The correct answer is <em>d. At equilibrium, the forward reaction and reverse reaction will have the same reaction rate.</em>
Explanation:
When a reaction begins, the reactants combine to form products. At the same time of product formation, the convertion of products into reactants also occur. The reaction reaches <em>chemical equilibrium </em>when the rate of forward reaction (the convertion of reactant into products) is equal to the rate of reverse reaction (the convertion of product into reactants). Upon this state, the concentration of reactants and products do not change in time (that does not mean that the concentration of reactants and products are equal, but that once the chemical equilibrium is reached, their concentrations at this point will not vary with the time because the forward and reverse reactions are occuring at the same velocity).
1070 hours.
1 mole of iron-59 would mass 59 grams, so 0.133 picograms would be 0.133x10^-12 / 59 = 2.25x10^-15 moles of iron-59. Multiplying by Avogadro's number, we can determine the number of atoms of iron-59 we have, so: 2.25x10^-15 * 6.02214x10^23 = 1.35x10^9
Since we have 242 decays over a period of 1 second, we can divide the
number of atoms left by the original number of atoms
(1350000000 - 242)/1350000000
= 1349999758/1350000000
= 0.999999820740741
And calculate the logarithm to base 2 of that quotient.
ln(0.999999820740741)/ln(2)
= -1.79259275281191x10^-7/0.693147180559945
= -2.58616467481524x10^-7
The reciprocal of this number will be the half life in seconds. So
-1/2.58616467481524x10^-7
= -3866729.79388461
And dividing by 3600 (number of seconds in an hour) will give the half-life in
hours.
-3866729.79388461 / 3600 = -1074.091609
So the half life in hours to 3 significant figures is 1070 hours.
Dividing that figure by 24 gives a half life of 44.58 days which is in pretty close agreement to the official half-life of 44.495 days for iron-59.
The answer is B for number 1 because rather than it being an observation it is something that you know for sure happened without guessing.
the answer is B the researcher is actually adding the fertilizer and measuring it.
Answer:
<h2>Which of the following statements correctly describes a difference between mechanical waves and electromagnetic waves?</h2><h2><em>
:- Mechanical waves require a medium to travel through, whereas electromagnetic waves can travel through empty space.</em></h2>
<em>is the correct</em>
<em>pls mark me as brainliest pls </em>
<em></em>
<h3 />
Answer:
1. Orbital diagram
2p⁴ ║ ↑↓ ║ "↑" ║ ↑
2s² ║ ↑↓ ║
1s² ║ ↑↓ ║
2. Quantum numbers
- <em>n </em>= 2,
- <em>l</em> = 1,
= 0,
= +1/2
Explanation:
The fill in rule is:
- Follow shell number: from the inner most shell to the outer most shell, our case from shell 1 to 2
- Follow the The Aufbau principle, 1s<2s<2p<3s<3p<4s<3d<4p<5s<4d<5p<6s<4f<5d<6p<7s<5f<6d<7p
- Hunds' rule: Every orbital in a sublevel is singly occupied before any orbital is doubly occupied. All of the electrons in singly occupied orbitals have the same spin (to maximize total spin).
So, the orbital diagram of given element is as below and the sixth electron is marked between " "
2p⁴ ║ ↑↓ ║ "↑" ║ ↑
2s² ║ ↑↓ ║
1s² ║ ↑↓ ║
The quantum number of an electron consists of four number:
- <em>n </em>(shell number, - 1, 2, 3...)
- <em>l</em> (subshell number or orbital number, 0 - orbital <em>s</em>, 1 - orbital <em>p</em>, 2 - orbital <em>d...</em>)
- (orbital energy, or "which box the electron is in"). For example, orbital <em>p </em>(<em>l</em> = 1) has 3 "boxes", it was number from -1, 0, 1. Orbital <em>d</em> (<em>l </em>= 2) has 5 "boxes", numbered -2, -1, 0, 1, 2
- (spin of electron), either -1/2 or +1/2
In our case, the electron marked with " " has quantum number
- <em>n </em>= 2, shell number 2,
- <em>l</em> = 1, subshell or orbital <em>p,</em>
- = 0, 2nd "box" in the range -1, 0, 1
- = +1/2, single electron always has +1/2
