→ Solutions
⇒ Simplify <span><span><span>4<span>(<span>2a</span>)</span></span>+<span>7<span>(<span>−<span>4b</span></span>)</span></span></span>+<span><span>3c</span><span>(5)</span></span></span><span>⇒ </span><span><span><span><span><span>8a</span>+</span>−<span>28b</span></span>+<span>15<span>c
Answer
</span></span></span></span><span>⇒ </span><span>8a−28b</span><span>+</span><span>15c</span>
Answer:
a. 199,389
b. b. From the part A, the question suggests a 0.9% yearly decrease which amounts to 199,389. This answer does not correspond to their recorded figure because the 0.9% decrease was just an average taken over the period. There could be years that the decrease was way smaller than the recorded average, thus using average may not be a good way for calculating population decrease over a period of time.
Step-by-step explanation:
a. Population in 2009 = 192,370
This means that in 2005 the population = 192,370 x 1.009 x 1.009 x 1.009 x 1.009 = 199,389
b. From the part A, the question suggests a 0.9% yearly decrease which amounts to 199,389. This answer does not correspond to their recorded figure because the 0.9% decrease was just an average taken over the period. There could be years that the decrease was way smaller than the recorded average, thus using average may not be a good way for calculating population decrease over a period of time.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Weight of baby goat = Weight of Jared with goat - Weight of Jared
= 58.9 - 56.2
= 2.7 Kg
Answer:
add
Step-by-step explanation:
