1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
miv72 [106K]
3 years ago
8

Mrs. Smith decides to buy three sweaters and a pair of jeans. she had $120 in her wallet. if the price of jeans is $35, what is

the highest possible price (p) of a sweater, if each sweater, if each sweater is the same price? write, solve, and graph the inequality.

Mathematics
2 answers:
mylen [45]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The highest possible price of a sweater is $28.33

Step-by-step explanation:

We already know that price j of jeans is $35.Let's say Mrs.Smith buys 3 sweaters for p dollars each, and since her budget is $120 we have the inequality:

3p+j\leq 120\\ \\\\=3p+35\leq 120

Therefore

p\leq 28.33

Thus the maximum price of a sweater is $28.33

USPshnik [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

<h2>The highest price possible of a sweater is $28.33.</h2>

Givens

  • Mrs. Smith decides to by three sweaters and a pair of jeans.
  • She had $120, that's the restriction, so she cannot spend more than that.

Let's represents sweaters with x and jeans with y. The inequality that models this situation is

3x+y\leq 120

There you can observe the money restriction and the exact number per item she wants to buy.

To find the solution of this inequality, we have to draw the line 3x+y=120, which represents the border of the solution area.

Then, we evaluate the inequality with a test point (0,0).

The image attached shows the result of this process. Notice that the solution area is below the line, beacuse (0,0) must be part of the solution area.

However, we already know that jeans costs $35, replacing it in the expression, we have

3x+35\leq 120\\x=\leq \frac{120-35}{3}\\ x\leq 28.33

Therefore, the highest price possible of a sweater is $28.33.

(The second image attached shows this result)

You might be interested in
What is the solution for 5x^2-x+6=0
kati45 [8]

The easiest way to solve this problem is by using the Pythagorean theorem :D

Pythagorean theorem: [-b +- sqrt(b^2 - 4ac)]/2a

5 = a

-1 = b

6 = c

therefore, by plugging these values in!

[-(-1) +- sqrt((-1)^2 - 4(5)(6))]/2(5)

[1 +- sqrt(1 - 120)]/10

Oh so we're using imaginary numbers, so in this case you'll need to know that i = sqrt(-1), so keep this in mind (I can see why this was so difficult)

[1 +- sqrt(119)*i]10

answers:

( 1 + i*sqrt(119) ) / 10

( 1 - i*sqrt(119) ) / 10

7 0
3 years ago
<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=1%20%2B%20%20log_%7B2%7D%28x%20-%202%29%20%20%3D%20%20%20log_%7B2%7Dx" id="TexFormula1" title=
fenix001 [56]

Move all the logarithms on the left hand side, and all the constants on the other:

\log_2(x-2) - \log_2(x) = -1

Use the rule of logarithms

\log_a(b) - \log_a(c) = \log_a\left(\dfrac{b}{c}\right)

To rewrite the equation as

\log_2\left(\dfrac{x-2}{x}\right) = -1

Evaluate 2 to the power of each side:

\dfrac{x-2}{x} = 2^{-1} = \dfrac{1}{2}

Multiply both sides by 2x:

2(x-2) = x \iff 2x-4 = x \iff x = 4

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the volume of the pyramid? <br> A. 60 ft^3<br> B. 240 ft^3<br> C. 106.7 ft^3<br> D. 80 ft^3
uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

the correct answer is

D. 80 ft^3

vol. of pyramid = (l× w × h)/3

= (6×8×5)/3

= 80 ft^3

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Myra is evaluating the expression –31. 7 4. 5x, when x = 2. 1. -31. 7 4. 5(2. 1) –27. 2(2. 1) –57. 12 What was Myra’s error? Myr
murzikaleks [220]

This is just an algebraic problem, the correct option is:

<em>"Myra should have multiplied 4.5 and 2.1 first."</em>

<h3>How to evaluate an expression?</h3>

Here we want to evaluate the expression:

-31.7 + 4.5*x

in x = 2.1

This just means that we need to replace x by 2.1 in the given equation.

Now, what Myra does is:

-31.7 + 4.5*2.1 = -27.2*2.1

So she took the sum between -31.7 and 4.5 first, this is her mistake, you only would do that if the expression was:

(-31.7 + 4.5)*2.1

But in our expression:

-31.7 + 4.5*2.1

The first thing you need to solve is the product in the second term, so we get:

-31.7 + 4.5*2.1 = -31.7 + 9.45 = -22.25

If you want to learn more about algebra, you can read:

brainly.com/question/4344214

4 0
2 years ago
The length of a rectangle is 4 cm more than the width and the perimeter is at least 34 cm
Aleks [24]
It is 28 i think been 3 year since i did this

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • At this same time in 2010, 78% of people said they went out dancing at least one night a month. Recently, this number has increa
    9·2 answers
  • What is 2|u| – |v|, if u = –9 and v = –2? <br><br> A. –18<br> B. 16<br> C. –20<br> D. 20
    14·2 answers
  • What is the fifth term of the arithmetic sequence 7,3,-1....
    8·1 answer
  • Which is a unit of measurement for volume? A. m B. m2 C. m3
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the expression 19 − 14 ÷ 7 in simplified form?
    13·1 answer
  • A=3 and c=2 10a - 3 - 5c - 2c
    8·1 answer
  • How many eighteens are there in 8/9?
    11·1 answer
  • Solve for n, 4 x n = 7 x 16
    7·2 answers
  • \3 units
    5·1 answer
  • Show how to do all 3 for brainliest
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!