The constitution has been mentioned by many people so far. Sure. That does answer your question in a literal sense. However, which dictators throughout history have ever cared about the laws in their country?
Besides laws and the constitution, what many Canadians would be reluctant to mention is the fact that there are 38+ million people in Canada, many of whom are armed. The prime minister is just one person. Sure, they control the military, but Canada is huge! Armed civilians using guerilla tactics would be a serious challenge for Canada's military, even if they backed the would be dictator, which I think would be unlikely, especially by a majority.
Just to be clear to our southern neighbours, we don't need “the 2nd” to defend ourselves from a would be dictator. We are just fine. And we have lots of guns.
The correct answer is: Dane knows that <em>stress </em>is anything that challenges him psychologically or physiologically and warrants some type of adaptation or adjustment.
Stress is how our bodies responds to what we consider to be a threat. The body's capacity of defending itself are activated because the person is sensing some sort of danger approaching. That "danger" can be real or not, but the way our body reacts will be the same. When we feel stress, is our body trying to protect us from that threat.
Answer:
Local newspapers are heavily relied on by the public for a lot of the local information that they need. National newspapers, on the other hand, provide people with stories from across the U.S., and around the world.
Explanation:
Answer:
Option d (Diathesis stress model) would be the correct alternative.
Explanation:
- A model that somehow discusses the condition, its implications, its effects as well as several disorder-related issues, would be termed as Diathesis stress model.
- Social anxiety seems to be an illness here as well and apprehension seems to be the result of the whole condition when coping towards social acceptance or cultural recognition.
All other choices aren't related to the given scenario. So the above is the appropriate choice.
Answer:
pretty sure the US bought alaska for dirt cheap, even by 19th century standards.
