Answer:A
Step-by-step explanation:positive is bigger then negative.
So first let me assume that the Total profit of the racquets are 8 percentage and not individually.
Now to find the profit we can do
20 x 100= 2000
Now
8=x/2000*100
X= 160
And now for loss
10x80=800
Now
15= x/800*100
X=120
Now profit =
160-120 = 40
The profit was only 40
There is 41 dots in total
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information:
The null and the alternative hypothesis can be well written as:


Given that:
n = 200
x = 135
Alpha ∝ = 0.05 level of significance
Then;
⇒ 
= 200 × 0.6 × (1 -0.6)
= 200 × 0.6 × 0.4
= 48 ≥ 10
The sample proportion 

= 0.675
The test statistics 


Z = 2.165
The P-value = P(Z > 2.165)
= 1 - P(Z < 2.165)
From the z tables
= 1 - 0.9848
= 0.0152
Reject the null hypothesis since P-Value is lesser than alpha. ( i.e. 0.0152 < 0.05).
Thus, there is enough evidence to conclude that the value of the population proportion is greater than 0.6
Interest = $500*0.12=$60
Processing fee = $25
Total finance charge = $(60+25)=$85.
APR=(total finance charge)/amount borrowed
=85/500
=17%