1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yakvenalex [24]
3 years ago
10

How were the rulers of mercantilism used to the country's power?

History
1 answer:
True [87]3 years ago
3 0
Money was wealth sui generis; it gave its holder the power<span> to obtain other commodities ... During the age of Stuart absolutism James I (</span>ruled<span> 1603–1625) and Charles I .... dependence on their mother</span>countries<span> as defined by the </span>mercantilist<span> model ..... Direct bounties </span>were used to promote the colonial production of hemp.<span>The leading </span>countries<span> of Europe soon found themselves competing for control of world trade routes. Trade meant money and money meant </span>power. A system called "mercantilism<span>" developed in which </span>kings<span>tried to increase their </span>country's<span> ... Plantations </span>were<span> started which </span>used<span> slave labor to grow such cash crops as sugar.

</span>
You might be interested in
What was the purpose of the monroe doctrine? to protect china from interference from european nations to protect latin american
SCORPION-xisa [38]
The Monroe doctrine said that European colonization on American land was an act of aggression. So, of the choices you provided the second one is correct.<span />
5 0
3 years ago
How did a lord pay serfs for their work? List 3 things mentioned. (2:00)​
xxMikexx [17]

Answer:

food, shelter, happiness

Explanation:

dude trust me

3 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast the changes in the government, economy, and society from the Romanov era under the tsar to the rule by the
Tresset [83]

The rulers of the Soviet Union viewed empire and imperialism in ideological terms as ‘the highest and final stage of capitalism’.1 By this Leninist definition, the Soviet Union did not identify itself as an empire, and instead, its leaders vehemently denounced imperialism that was carried out by its enemies and competitors: the capitalist states. Despite its own anguish over being identified as an empire, the Soviet Union indeed was one. While the meaning of ‘empire’ has shifted over time, for the purposes of this paper the definition of empire is in the sense of a great power, a polity, ruling over vast territories and people, leaving a significant impact on the history of world civilizations.2 As the characteristics of the Soviet Union are examined, support for viewing the USSR as an empire grows.

The Soviet Union emerged after the Russian Revolution of 1917. The Tsarist Russian Empire’s government was overthrown by the local soviets, led by the Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks attempted to replace the Russian empire with a communist one, in which socialism would make nationalismobsolete and in place there would be a supra-national imperial ideology.3 Still, coming back to the issue of ‘empire’, the Soviet Union clearly maintained a commanding control over multi-ethnic and multi-linguistic societies that surpassed the extent of the preceding Imperial Russia Empire. A question thus arises: was the USSR a Russian empire? The first aspect to consider is if the USSR was a continuation of Russian imperialist power or if an intrinsic distinction can be made between the two. What is notable to address is what is meant by ‘Russian’ identity and nationality, its formation, and reshaping through time. Once this will be accounted for, this paper will move on with an answer to the question: the USSR was indeed an essentially different empire from the one preceding it, and thus, the USSR was not a Russian empire.


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Believed the Constitution offered a good balance of power between the states and the central government.
Anni [7]
I think….federalist. (I am middle school student but I hope this helps).
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do you think women lost some of their freedoms when Japan became a warrior society ?
swat32

Explanation: Before Japan became a warrior society, the country was already a patriarchal society which valued men much more than women. However, the impact of this was limited to smaller areas of influence because women performed valuable work and men were not particularly powerful. However, these ideas became a lot more dominant after men were able to gain more power. As the qualities of a warrior became more celebrated, those that were different became more dismissed. Therefore, the role of women was devalued as they had no participation in war activities.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is not an idea from the Enlightenment?
    11·2 answers
  • What are the differences between the southwest and the northwest?
    14·1 answer
  • How did the great depression affect the lives of urban and rural americans?
    7·1 answer
  • What was Benjamin Franklin best known for as a scientist
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the three reconstruction amendments had the greatest impact?
    10·2 answers
  • How did the coastline of the Confederacy offer the South an advantage during the Civil War?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the difference between paper currency and coins?
    7·1 answer
  • President Franklin Roosevelt's
    12·1 answer
  • How often must the president deliver a state of the union message to congress
    13·1 answer
  • Please help ill give brainly &lt;333 (no links or ill report u)
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!