Answer:
It is known as pluralistic ignorance.
Explanation:
Pluralistic ignorance occurs in social situations when an individual does not feel free to express their opinion and makes a wrong inference of what their peers think, so they end up accepting the option they believe the group would choose, even if they disagree.
An example would be: Karla is on the bus, and a person sits next to her, she watches the woman and thinks that looks like a kind person and would like to talk with her for a while, but nobody talks with other people on the bus so avoid talking to her.
The spectator effect is an example of pluralistic ignorance; when an emergency occurs, the larger the group that observed the emergency situation, the less likely someone will help. The individual in the group may think that it would not be right to help, or that he/she should not help because surely another person would help.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
<span>increased from 10% in 1976 to 20% in 2006
These type of women usually choose not to have children on their own due to time (if those women choose to not have children in order to pursue a certain lifestyle or career) or genetic factors (if those women had a physiological condition where they can't have children or having one will expose them to a certain amount of risk)
</span>
Answer:
They would see "a woman who is engaging in a social norm."
Explanation:
A sociological imagination allows a person to view things socially and this entails pulling away from the situation and looking at the situation from another standpoint. Being at a bar and purchasing a glass of wine is simply seen as a social norm. It does not matter whether it is done by a man or a woman.
