Answer:
We are 95% confident that the true proportion of TV audience is between 65.15% and 65.85%
Step-by-step explanation:
-From the given information, 
.
-We calculate the confidence interval using this value at 95% confidence level:
![CI=\hat p\pm z \sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n}}\\\\\\=0.65\pm 1.96\times \sqrt{\frac{0.65\times 0.35}{12000}}\\\\\\=0.65\pm 0.0085\\\\\\=[0.6415,0.6585]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=CI%3D%5Chat%20p%5Cpm%20z%20%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B%5Chat%20p%281-%5Chat%20p%29%7D%7Bn%7D%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D0.65%5Cpm%201.96%5Ctimes%20%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B0.65%5Ctimes%200.35%7D%7B12000%7D%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D0.65%5Cpm%200.0085%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%5B0.6415%2C0.6585%5D)
So, the 95% confidence interval is (0.6515,0.6585).
Hence, we are 95% confident that the true proportion of TV audience is between 65.15% and 65.85%.
Answer:
Isnt it where you write it in the easiest way to understand it? sorry if its wrong :/
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The answer is 3/4 because 2/4 + 1/4 = 3/4.
Yes no yes yes no
hope it helps
Answer:
5. 1
6. Kari is not correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
5. All like terms can be combined. There will be one term remaining after they are.
___
6. The appropriate factoring is x(x+1). This is not the same as x(2x+1).
In order to show equivalence, you need to show that the expressions produce the same result for as many different values of x as the degree of the expression plus 1. That is, you'd need to show equivalence for <em>3 different values of x</em>, as a minimum for this second-degree expression.
