1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
JulijaS [17]
2 years ago
5

1. How did the Nazis maintain calm and order during the extermination process?

History
1 answer:
viktelen [127]2 years ago
8 0
1. Nazis kept the people calm before killing them by claiming that they were going through a "routine cleansing or delousing procedure". They hid the idea of the gas chambers by disguising them as showers. This made the people not suspect what was actually awaiting them. 
2. Operation Reinhard served mainly as a concentration camp designed to house Jews and other groups for the purposes of slave labor. Auschwitz on the other hand killed the majority of the people that came in, sparing only a few for slave labor. 
3. There appeared at first to be little to no major press about the liberation of the camps because the Russians viewed the Holocaust in a different light than its western counterparts. For Russia, the Holocaust was an attempt to wipe out the entire Russian people, not just Jews, gypsies, political opponents, etc. There was also confusion in the reporting. Some leaders claimed it was Ukrainians, not Russians. This showed signs of the political strife that can still be seen today. However, Russia did release information on the liberation of the camps. Their purpose, upon finding them, still remained the same. They did not add a secondary mission to save those suffering. Many of those soldiers had seen and endured horrible scenes almost as bad as what they saw when they marched into Auschwitz. 
4. Survivors of Auschwitz were given food and clothing. Many received and found help from various organizations that were created to help them relocate to Western European nations, the US, Palestine, or other countries around the world. They were given shelter in refugee camps. 
5. The primary goal of the death marches was to move those in the camps to camps away from the front line and to continue to use them as slave labor. They marched them as a way to weed out the weak. This would lessen the number that would need to be watched over and "cared for."
You might be interested in
Who was the only president to take the oath of office aboard an airplane?
alexandr402 [8]
President <span>Lyndon B. Johnson</span>
8 0
3 years ago
How did hitler expand Germany’s territory
Damm [24]
By killing Jewish ppl
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How are a concurring opinion and a dissenting opinion on a Supreme Court case different?
Tems11 [23]

Answer:

A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.

Explanation:

Dissenting opinions serve several purposes. They can help to achieve an appeal review of the case by the full court or by recovering the case materials, verify and clarify issues for a subsequent appeal. With their help, it is possible to achieve the adoption of legislation to make up for possible shortcomings in the rule of law. Dissenting opinions can also help narrow the scope of the decision by pointing out the possible dangers of the majority position, or inform other judges and the bar attorneys about the limitations of any decision and its effect on similar cases in the future. Thus, dissenting opinions can serve as a useful tool in bringing important information to the attention of those interested in judicial decisions and to promote the development of law .

Concurring opinions are appropriate when they are aimed at achieving greater accuracy in the issue of the impact of the decision, or in this way informing the parties and other audience about important points in the opinion of the author. Thus, judges can give concurring opinions in the case when there are two reasons for the decision, and the majority justifies its decision only on the basis of one of them, and the other judges consider that alternative reasons must also be indicated. The concurring opinion shall include an indication of the reasons for agreeing with the majority opinion. The point is not to present an alternative opinion to the majority opinion, but to indicate the point of difference with it and further outline the contours of the decision.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What difference between Sierra Leone and Tanzania leads to their economic differences?
lawyer [7]

Answer:

the answer is

Resources

8 0
2 years ago
The practice of awarding bronze medals for 3rd place began at the 1904 olympics in what city
Shkiper50 [21]
The city is St. Louis, Missouri
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • This illustration shows a building in Alexandria during the Hellenistic Age. A building in Alexandria during the Hellenistic Age
    15·2 answers
  • "life in the american wilderness was nasty, brutish, and short for the earliest chesapeake settlers." explain.
    13·1 answer
  • What was the model document from which future state constitutions were developed?
    6·2 answers
  • Why did Hedrick want Fremont to become the US president?
    8·2 answers
  • What type of laws do you think Virginia settlers would have liked the burgesses to pass? Try to imagine what it was like to be a
    13·1 answer
  • 15 POINTS
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following defines Homo erectus?
    7·1 answer
  • How were the Persians different from the assyrians
    10·1 answer
  • In an effort to "modernize" Japan, Emperor Meiji did all of the following EXCEPT:
    10·1 answer
  • How did discrimination affect African Americans in the UnitedStates military?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!