Comment
You have to begin by declaring what g(f(x)) means. It means that wherever you see an x in g(x) you put in f(x).
It will look like this to start with
g(f(x)) = (f(x) + 5) / (f(x)
Now substitute into this for g(-3)
g(x^2 + 5) = (x^2 + 5 + 5)/(x^2 + 5) It's time to use some numbers.
g(- 3) = ((-3)^2 + 10)/( (-3)^2 +5)
g(-3) = ( 9 + 10 ) / ( 9 + 5)
g(-3) = (19)/14 <<<<<< answer.
C <<<< answer.
the answer is 54 9/14
because Divide using long division. The whole number portion will be the number of times the denominator of the original fraction divides evenly into the numerator of the original fraction, and the fraction portion of the mixed number will be the remainder of the original fraction division over the denominator of the original fraction.
Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
Answer:
A 24 because half of 12 is 6 then 6 x 4 is 24
B 90÷3 is 30 which is 2/3 of 45
Hope this helps you
1000 this is because it is the right one
