Answer:
Rodney should win the case because he showed up to do the work but Yolanda failed to perform her part of the contract (provide the paint).
The legal term used to describe Rodney's offer of performance is tender or attempted performance. In this case, Rodney (the promisor) went to Yolanda's house and offered to perform his painting services. Yolanda (the promisee) did not perform her part of the contract by not providing the paint, so the promisor was unable to perform. Since Rodney's non-performance was directly caused by Yolanda's non-performance, he is not liable for anything since Yolanda lost her rights because she breached the contract first.
Your answer would be C pretty sure.
It is tough to answer this question because there are so many options based on what you want to do.
If you want to research prices, www.wine-searcher.com is the most complete price comparison website. If you are going to buy a lot of wine, their Professional version is worth it.
If you want to track your wine collection, read user reviews, or see basic product information... www.cellartracker.com is the best site.
If you want to learn about wine, there are endless websites that could be useful. You need to try wine to learn about it. To read about wine, I read Alder Yarrow's Vinography wine blog, Tyler Colman's Dr. Vino wine blog, and a few other wine blogs.
If you want to engage with other wine enthusiasts (especially the geekier ones), check out wineberserkers.com.
For expert advice, you can go to WineSpectator.com, eRobertParker.com, jancisrobinson.com... or some of the regional specialists like RhoneReport, and Burghound.
Answer: D) DNA evidence that does not match Ronald.
Explanation: Just took the test and got this question right. :-)
Letter D is the correct answer because DNA evidence is the most reliable out of the other choices. Hope I was helpful!
