Only plants have chloroplast and a cell wall
<span>Notice a couple of things
different between (A) and (B). It was NOT the first time a biologist
proposed that species changed through time (so it's not B). But it
finally *solidified* that idea by giving "change through time"
(evolution) a MECHANISM. It gave a plausible explanation for WHY
species change over time, in a testable way that made sense and had
evidence to support it.
So it finally dismissed the idea that species are constant.
It also emphasized that the simple presence of *variation* within a population was a key reason for evolution.
While we're at it ... (C) is wrong because it's not *individuals* that
acclimate (adapt) to their environment, but the population (the species)
as a whole.
And (D) is wrong because it had nothing to do with economics or the monarchy.</span>
<span>I think the correct answer is no. The sugars in the apple juice do not need to be broken down before used as an energy source. The sugar in the said drink are mostly fructose which can be metabolized by the body for use. Hope this answers the question.</span>
The consumer is the bird because it is getting its energy by eating the fruit from the bush.
