1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gregori [183]
3 years ago
11

Which best describes the situation Vietnam veterans faced after returning to the United States? Some had physical injuries that

needed to heal, but most readjusted smoothly to civilian life. Most quickly found work and put behind them the events they had witnessed during the war.Many found themselves welcomed back by a nation that was proud of the job they had done in Vietnam.Many suffered from physical and mental injuries, while others felt hostility from civilians around them
History
2 answers:
lina2011 [118]3 years ago
6 0
Many suffered from physical and mental injuries, while others felt hostility from civilians around them.
bija089 [108]3 years ago
5 0

<em>The correct answer is : Many suffered from physical and mental injuries, while others felt hostility from civilians around them.</em>

Many Vietnam veterans suffered from <em>Post Traumatic Stress Disorder</em> ( PTSD ). PTSD was officially recognized as mental condition in 1980, Vietnam veterans were the first soldiers to have this term applied to. Today, 50 years after the end of the Vietnam war, many veterans still suffer from PTSD every day.

This disorder, which is in fact a mental injury, is defined as having flashbacks ( to fighting scenes during combat in the war ), upsetting memories and anxiety, all this as a result of a traumatic event.

Apart from PTSD, many suffer from physical conditions, most of which are : musculoskeletar injuries and pain, chemical exposure, traumatic brain injury, noise and vibration exposure and many more.

Because the Vietnam War was highly controversial and fought on moral grounds, <em>many veterans experienced hostility on their return from the war. </em>Their involvement in the war was questioned, they were accused of senseless murdering of innocent Vietnamese peasants and destroying the environment there.



You might be interested in
How did Watson and Crick's discovery, shown above, advance knowledge of human life?(its a pic of a DNA strand )
Elan Coil [88]

B. It helped explain why people have certain characteristics. I just took this test I studied like crazy.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where did christianity orginate?
enot [183]
Christianity is a monotheistic religion that originated from Jesus who founded it. Judaism is the jewish religion made first by Abraham , then the newest of the 3 biggest religions is Islam founded by Muhammad
Please note all 3 religions worship the same god, they just have different holy texts, and views on gods prophets.
4 0
4 years ago
In the US some people believe controls necessary while others believe gun rights should not be restricted what is the effect of
tigry1 [53]

Answer:

I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the fugitive slave law of 1793 considered a danger to free blacks?
Maurinko [17]
<span>The Fugitive Slave Acts were a pair of federal laws that allowed for the capture and return of runaway slaves within the territory of the United States. Enacted by Congress in 1793, the first Fugitive Slave Act authorized local governments to seize and return escaped slaves to their owners and imposed penalties on anyone who aided in their flight. Widespread resistance to the 1793 law led to the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which added more provisions regarding runaways and levied even harsher punishments for interfering in their capture. The Fugitive Slave Acts were among the most controversial laws of the early 19th century.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
What are the influences and differences between American English and British English?
mote1985 [20]

Answer:

Explanation:

Differences:

Probably the biggest difference among the two is -- vocabulary.

Both nations use some common terms on the daily basis that are differently written and pronounced.

The Americans live in apartments, the Brits live in a flat.

The Americans drive a truck, the Brits drive a lorry.

The difference is also seen in auxiliary verbs -- for example will and shall.

Even though Americans have that word in their vocabulary, they don't really use it. They find it too stiff and formal.

When a Brit would say, '' I shall go home now '' ,he express that this certain action will occur somewhere in the near future.

The Americans would say, '' I will go home now '' .

There is a visible difference in past tense verbs as well.

We all know the three columns that each verb has, well, Brits don't (almost) ever use the third column, aka, past participle.

When a Brit would say '' I haven never got a pet as a present '', American would answer '' I've gotten three by now ''.

When it comes to tag questions, Brits use it way more than the Americans, even though both of their dictionaries contain them.

A Brit would say '' You love me, don't you? '' where an American would simply keep it at '' You love me? ''

There are many difference in spelling, too.

For Americans, it's as simple as flavor, color, favor, labor.

For the Brits, it's a bit flavour, colour, favour and labour.

Still, there are many more similarities than actual differences.

Influences:

The Americans decided to change their language because of Noah Webster.

He had a vision that America as a new nation should have differences compared to the British people. He wanted to show America's independence.

For a fact, American English is actually older than British.

British English sounds more like french which can be seen in some of the words with - our.

Both of the nations have collected words from different languages: French, Arabic, Spanish... etc.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which is the definition of the word borne as it is used in the excerpt below?
    11·1 answer
  • The Spanish borderlands were located
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following was not a muckraker during the Progressive Era?
    14·1 answer
  • The Renaissance was a period of
    10·1 answer
  • What were the characteristics of trench warfare?
    7·1 answer
  • write an argumentative paragraph in response to the prompt. Give your answer in the form of at least four to six sentences, and
    12·2 answers
  • Read this description of Abraham Lincoln.
    13·2 answers
  • Evaluate the relationship of the Latin American Republics with the United States in the post-colonial period.
    7·1 answer
  • True/False: To try and convince European leaders to come back to the Catholic Church, Church leaders compromised and fully gave-
    9·1 answer
  • ANSWER NOW! How has the war in Ukraine affected farmers in the US?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!