Answer:
Explanation:
the power to commission officers, as applied in practice, does not mean that the President is under constitutional obligation to commission those whose appointments have reached that stage, but merely that it is he and no one else who has the power to commission them, and that he may do so at his discretion. Under the doctrine of Marbury v. Madison, the sealing and delivery of the commission is a purely ministerial act which has been lodged by statute with the Secretary of State, and which may be compelled by mandamus unless the appointee has been in the meantime validly removed. By an opinion of the Attorney General many years later, however, the President, even after he has signed a commission, still has a locus poenitentiae and may withhold it; nor is the appointee in office till he has this commission. This is probably the correct doctrine.
Answer:
Supreme court; High Court; District Court and Additional District; Subordinate Judge Class I; Subordinate Judge Class II; Court of Small Causes for Metropolitan Cities; Munsif's Court or Court of Sub Judge III Class
Answer:
simple include healthy food
Explanation:
there is a very easy way to compromise in a situation such as this one all you have to do is include healthier foods at a lower price than the unhealthy foods to create incentive to buy the healthy food
Answer:
In contract law, the term consideration refers to the serious thought that underlies a party's intent to enter into a contract. To be legally sufficient, consideration must be evidenced by something tangible. The element of bargained-for exchange distinguishes contracts from gifts.
Answer:
the answer is number 2 or B
Explanation: