1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anvisha [2.4K]
3 years ago
5

Madison Mayberry, a black woman, has worked in the mailroom at Worldwide Pictures for 16 years. When a mailroom supervisor posit

ion becomes open, Madison applies for the job but she is not selected. Instead, Renee Alton, the director of administration, hires Sally Wright, a white woman. When Madison complains to Renee, she says that she selected Sally because they are best friends and Sally needed a better job after her divorce. Madison files a complaint of racial discrimination with the EEOC.
Select one:
a. Madison will not prevail because it would be an undue hardship for Sally if she were not selected for the supervisory job.
b. Madison will prevail on her complaint because Renee's explanation is unbelievable and is an obvious pretext for discrimination.
c. Madison will prevail on her complaint because she is clearly better qualified than the person who was selected and that person is of a different race.
d. Madison will not prevail because not every decision that is arbitrary or unfair is discrimination.
Law
1 answer:
OLga [1]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: Madison will not prevail because not every decision that is arbitrary or unfair is discrimination.

Explanation:

Based on the issues discussed in the question, if Madison files a complaint of racial discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission(EEOC), it is highly unlikely that Madison will prevail based on the facts that were presented in this summary.

Madison already made a complaint to Renee who told her that she gave Sally the job because they are friends and she needed a better job after her divorce. There's no issue regarding discrimination in what happened on this case.

Fro her to prevail, she must prove specific violation in this case or demonstrate a pattern of discrimination in the workplace that has resulted in a race favored over another.

You might be interested in
How does the presidential power of commissioning all the officers of the United States link to Marbury v. Madison (1803)?
TEA [102]

Answer:

Explanation:

the power to commission officers, as applied in practice, does not mean that the President is under constitutional obligation to commission those whose appointments have reached that stage, but merely that it is he and no one else who has the power to commission them, and that he may do so at his discretion. Under the doctrine of Marbury v. Madison, the sealing and delivery of the commission is a purely ministerial act which has been lodged by statute with the Secretary of State, and which may be compelled by mandamus unless the appointee has been in the meantime validly removed. By an opinion of the Attorney General many years later, however, the President, even after he has signed a commission, still has a locus poenitentiae and may withhold it; nor is the appointee in office till he has this commission. This is probably the correct doctrine.

6 0
3 years ago
Name the high courts from highest to lowest in their orders​
zhenek [66]

Answer:

Supreme court; High Court; District Court and Additional District; Subordinate Judge Class I; Subordinate Judge Class II; Court of Small Causes for Metropolitan Cities; Munsif's Court or Court of Sub Judge III Class

5 0
2 years ago
Your school district has debated the issue of allowing vending machines in schools. Some teachers say that children need to eat
andrey2020 [161]

Answer:

simple include healthy food

Explanation:

there is a very easy way to compromise in a situation such as this one all you have to do is include healthier foods at a lower price than the unhealthy foods to create incentive to buy the healthy food

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In contract law, the term consideration refers to the serious thought that underlies a party's intent to enter into a contract.
lukranit [14]

Answer:

In contract law, the term consideration refers to the serious thought that underlies a party's intent to enter into a contract. To be legally sufficient, consideration must be evidenced by something tangible. The element of bargained-for exchange distinguishes contracts from gifts.

3 0
2 years ago
Which of the following will cause demand for EMTs and paramedics to keep increasing?
Phoenix [80]

Answer:

the answer is number 2 or B

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In petroleum geology, _______ refers to rocks from which hydrocarbons have been generated or are capable of being generated.
    11·1 answer
  • Based on the facts of the previous question, Jay stays in the hospital for a few days as he is recuperating. Then, a couple of w
    12·1 answer
  • In debates leading up to the Three-Fifths Compromise, northern states argued that:  A. slaves should be able to buy their freed
    10·1 answer
  • You and your partner are dispatched to a welfare concern. ( What do you do?)
    11·2 answers
  • how a federal bill becomes a law. These cartoons are out of order. Number the cartoon panels from 1 to 12 in the correct order o
    7·1 answer
  • Police officer placing sign outside a rail station that says 'Waiting Room for White Only.'
    11·2 answers
  • Vận dụng cặp phạm trù nguyên nhân và kết quả trong giả quyết tai nạn giao thông
    6·1 answer
  • The pythagorean theorem is a special case of the law of cosines
    14·1 answer
  • What is equality of Nations, Nationalities and Peoples?​
    10·1 answer
  • Who sets bail for criminal offenses
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!