1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Margaret [11]
3 years ago
8

What is meant by a “private prosecutor?”

Law
2 answers:
wlad13 [49]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:The answer Is C

Explanation it makes a whole lot of sense.

lisov135 [29]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

C. Because yes.

You might be interested in
Giving alcohol to a person under 21 years of age is classified as a(n)
Yuliya22 [10]
This classifies as a crime
4 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Who is Sir Robert Peel?
algol13
Sir Robert Peel is “regarded as the father of modern British policing, owing to his founding of the Metropolitan Police Service”
And he was a British conservative statesman who was prime minister twice
3 0
3 years ago
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
3 years ago
1 and 2 1 and 2 1 and 2 1 and 2
Dima020 [189]
1 and 2 1 and 2 1 and 2 1 and 2 1 and 2
7 0
3 years ago
Answer pl
garik1379 [7]

Tina has the right to sue the company that sold her the product arguing that it had been recalled as potentially dangerous to consumers and she should be compensated for the damages caused by the dryer.

<h3>What should Tina do?</h3>

Tina must seek help from the Federal Trade Commission, this institution is in charge of protecting consumers and promoting competition between companies.

Based on the foregoing, Tina can rely on this institution to sue the company that sold her the dryer because this product had been withdrawn from the market for being dangerous.

So the company that sold him the dryer was committing a crime for selling this object. Additionally, this company must compensate Tina for the damages caused by this product.

Learn more about consumer in: brainly.com/question/950909

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the following text an example of?
    9·2 answers
  • A server is caught serving alcohol to a group of friends who are all 19 years old. This is the server's
    9·1 answer
  • The Highway Transportation System is made up of
    8·2 answers
  • List and explain the major types of legal defenses.
    11·1 answer
  • Do you think defendants in George Floyd case should be tried together or separately and why
    13·1 answer
  • Hwelp please with my work thanks so much
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is CORRECT regarding deciding whether an alcohol sale is legal?
    15·1 answer
  • Pháp luật đại cương là gì
    13·1 answer
  • What characteristics of the truffle trees make then a good example of a renewable natural resource that could easily become a no
    13·1 answer
  • QUESTION 7
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!